<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Building - Legal comment</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk</link>
<description>http://www.building.co.uk</description>

<item>
<title>Legal brief: Right to light consultation</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-right-to-light-consultation/5055071.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-right-to-light-consultation/5055071.article</guid>
<description>As the submission period for the consultation closes, the law commission starts its journey through a maze of competing issues</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legal brief: Duration of disputes</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-duration-of-disputes/5055006.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-duration-of-disputes/5055006.article</guid>
<description>Figures from EC Harris reveal that the duration of disputes in the construction sector in 2012 increased by a third compared to 2011</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The paperless trial</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/the-paperless-trial/5054654.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/the-paperless-trial/5054654.article</guid>
<description>Technology has already transformed how lawyers deal with information in court - and soon those heavy briefcases could be a thing of the past</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The sudden death clause</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/the-sudden-death-clause/5054956.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/the-sudden-death-clause/5054956.article</guid>
<description>It seems that a contract can contain all sorts of cheering words about partnering and still allow a termination without explanation. Don’t worry, it all makes sense to lawyers …</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:15 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Damage limitation</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/damage-limitation/5054405.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/damage-limitation/5054405.article</guid>
<description>Damages-based agreements give parties the freedom to choose how they wish to share the cost and risk of litigation. So, how do they work?</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:05 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Project bank accounts: What's not to like?</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/project-bank-accounts-whats-not-to-like?/5054308.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/project-bank-accounts-whats-not-to-like?/5054308.article</guid>
<description>Project bank accounts provide security of payment to contractors, reduce supply chain risk and even save the client money. They just need to be set up properly</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>London 2012 suppliers: Big yourself up</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/london-2012-suppliers-big-yourself-up/5054313.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/london-2012-suppliers-big-yourself-up/5054313.article</guid>
<description>Recent reports indicate many eligible firms have yet to apply for a recognition licence from the BOA. But London 2012 suppliers should take advantage - the benefits are well worth it</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Architect standards: Wrap them up in cotton wool</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/architect-standards-wrap-them-up-in-cotton-wool/5054553.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/architect-standards-wrap-them-up-in-cotton-wool/5054553.article</guid>
<description>When things went awry with the Wests’ riverside home, and the builder was already insolvent, they sued the architect. Why? He should have taken better care of them</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Architects Registration Board: Know your place</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/architects-registration-board-know-your-place/5054530.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/architects-registration-board-know-your-place/5054530.article</guid>
<description>An architect has been struck off for getting into debt. But is this really ‘professional misconduct’ to anyone other than the Lord Snootys of the profession?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Party wall disputes: The end of the party</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/party-wall-disputes-the-end-of-the-party/5053988.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/party-wall-disputes-the-end-of-the-party/5053988.article</guid>
<description>When a claimant drops a claim, they become liable to pay the defendant’s costs in party wall cases. But the Court of Appeal has recently issued guidance on when the courts can ignore this </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Walter Lilly vs Mackay: A curate’s egg</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/walter-lilly-vs-mackay-a-curate’s-egg/5054082.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/walter-lilly-vs-mackay-a-curate’s-egg/5054082.article</guid>
<description>Walter Lilly vs Mackay grabbed headlines and produced a lengthy judgement. But exceptional cases should not set general precedents in law</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>SSIs: Beware the newts</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/ssis-beware-the-newts/5053802.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/ssis-beware-the-newts/5053802.article</guid>
<description>Sites of special scientific interest can be a major barrier to development - even if you have planning permission. Here’s what to look out for</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legal brief: Do architects certificates operate as contracts?</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-do-architects-certificates-operate-as-contracts?/5054296.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-do-architects-certificates-operate-as-contracts?/5054296.article</guid>
<description>A decision by Mr Justice Akenhead in a recent case provides some clarity</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 May 2013 18:50 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wind farms: Second generation</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/wind-farms-second-generation/5053608.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/wind-farms-second-generation/5053608.article</guid>
<description>A lot of lessons have been learned about the technical side of building wind farms. But what about contracts? Lindy Patterson looks at how things have changed in the last decade</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 May 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Willmott Dixon vs Newlon: A case in points</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/willmott-dixon-vs-newlon-a-case-in-points/5053609.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/willmott-dixon-vs-newlon-a-case-in-points/5053609.article</guid>
<description>Tony Bingham’s column on the recent Willmott Dixon vs Newlon Housing dispute focused on procedural objections - but there’s an awful lot more to the case than that</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 May 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Professional negligence dispute: On the rocks</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/professional-negligence-dispute-on-the-rocks/5053631.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/professional-negligence-dispute-on-the-rocks/5053631.article</guid>
<description>When a judge blocked a £3m award to whisky maker Whyte &amp;amp; Mackay, he questioned whether a professional negligence dispute should have come to adjudication at all</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Doing business in Iraq: Tread carefully</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/doing-business-in-iraq-tread-carefully/5053759.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/doing-business-in-iraq-tread-carefully/5053759.article</guid>
<description>A decade after the invasion of Iraq there are opportunities for UK firms in the country’s infrastructure sector. But they must be aware of the legal framework they will be working in</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stop kicking up a fuss</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/stop-kicking-up-a-fuss/5053279.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/stop-kicking-up-a-fuss/5053279.article</guid>
<description>The lawyers in this case raised a number of clever, interesting technical objections. Which were quite rightly dismissed. Let’s just stick to the facts, eh?</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legal brief: Changes to judicial review process</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-changes-to-judicial-review-process/5053736.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-changes-to-judicial-review-process/5053736.article</guid>
<description>What do proposed changes to the judicial review system mean for planning and procurement decisions?</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:30 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Life on the high fees</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/life-on-the-high-fees/5053119.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/life-on-the-high-fees/5053119.article</guid>
<description>Adjudicators were meant to deal with construction disputes ‘expeditiously and relatively inexpensively’. But the amount they charge is becoming increasingly hard to justify</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NEC3 contracts: The hole truth and nothing but</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/nec3-contracts-the-hole-truth-and-nothing-but/5052930.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/nec3-contracts-the-hole-truth-and-nothing-but/5052930.article</guid>
<description>If only lawyers would get around to filling up the holes in the NEC3 contract</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CPC2013: Top form</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/cpc2013-top-form/5052997.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/cpc2013-top-form/5052997.article</guid>
<description>We need a new form of contract for complex projects that encourages a more scientific approach to risk management. Step forward CPC2013 …</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legal brief: Human rights vs adjudication</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-human-rights-vs-adjudication/5053323.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-human-rights-vs-adjudication/5053323.article</guid>
<description>A decision by the Scottish Courts on Whyte &amp;amp; MacKay Ltd vs Blyth and Blyth Consulting Engineers sets an interesting precedent</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legal brief: Multiple disputes?</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-multiple-disputes?/5053317.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-multiple-disputes?/5053317.article</guid>
<description>Willmott Dixon Housing Limited vs Newlon Housing Trust leads to an interesting development in adjudication law</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Leap of faith</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/leap-of-faith/5052785.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/leap-of-faith/5052785.article</guid>
<description>Despite what the Court of Appeal decided recently, isn’t a doctrine of good faith what the industry desperately needs?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:10 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Direct payment clauses: Caught in the middle</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/direct-payment-clauses-caught-in-the-middle/5052544.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/direct-payment-clauses-caught-in-the-middle/5052544.article</guid>
<description>An employer that gives itself the power to pay subcontractors direct if the main contractor does not, may find itself acting as a referee between two warring parties</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Doing without lawyers</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/doing-without-lawyers/5052640.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/doing-without-lawyers/5052640.article</guid>
<description>More people than ever are choosing to conduct their own construction case without using a lawyer. Fine, but it calls for a more hands-on approach from the referee</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beware restrictive covenants</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/beware-restrictive-covenants/5052758.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/beware-restrictive-covenants/5052758.article</guid>
<description>Restrictive covenants can deal a fatal blow to a developer’s plans. So make sure you understand what effect a convenant will have on the development before you take the plunge </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O ye of little faith</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/o-ye-of-little-faith/5052433.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/o-ye-of-little-faith/5052433.article</guid>
<description>A recent Court of Appeal case confirms the traditional English hostility to a general doctrine of good faith in the performance of contracts</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Apr 2013 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Making a drama out of a crisis</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/making-a-drama-out-of-a-crisis/5052786.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/making-a-drama-out-of-a-crisis/5052786.article</guid>
<description>Buildings and contents insurance is big business. But what happens when an insurer’s contractor’s subcontractor tries to get money from homeowners? In short, a bit of a mess</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Apr 2013 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Guaranteed maximum prices: Berth pangs</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/guaranteed-maximum-prices-berth-pangs/5052788.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/guaranteed-maximum-prices-berth-pangs/5052788.article</guid>
<description>Francis Ho dives into the topic of guaranteed maximum price provisions and discovers how the pricing provisions for the navy’s new submarine jetty in Scotland were sunk</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Apr 2013 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Uncharted territory: The Jackson reforms</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/uncharted-territory-the-jackson-reforms/5051915.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/uncharted-territory-the-jackson-reforms/5051915.article</guid>
<description>Lord Justice Jackson’s cost reforms, which come into force on 1 April, will create a new landscape for litigation. How will this affect construction and engineering cases?</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What implied terms imply</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/what-implied-terms-imply/5051940.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/what-implied-terms-imply/5051940.article</guid>
<description>The question of what terms should be implied - and what they mean when they are implied - is often at the centre of disputes, as recent cases show …</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Adjudication: A 63 lever arch file problem</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/adjudication-a-63-lever-arch-file-problem/5051999.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/adjudication-a-63-lever-arch-file-problem/5051999.article</guid>
<description>Doubtless you’d feel miffed to have to wade through huge files of material in just seven days so you can serve your response. But don’t expect a court judge to take pity on you</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tax compliance: Anything to declare?</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/tax-compliance-anything-to-declare?/5051592.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/tax-compliance-anything-to-declare?/5051592.article</guid>
<description>New government rules mean that any contractors bidding for public projects will have to disclose a 10-year tax history - and any non-compliance will need a good explanation</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Contempt of court: Jailhouse rock</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/contempt-of-court-jailhouse-rock/5051579.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/contempt-of-court-jailhouse-rock/5051579.article</guid>
<description>Here’s a case that started out as a workaday adjudication case and ended up with one party trying to get the other banged up in prison for contempt of court</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Litigation privilege: Open secrets</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/litigation-privilege-open-secrets/5052047.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/litigation-privilege-open-secrets/5052047.article</guid>
<description>If a document comes into existence for the purpose of litigation, privilege from disclosure can be claimed. But, as a recent case shows, it may be hard to persuade the court to allow the claim</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Legal brief: HS2 consultation ruling</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-hs2-consultation-ruling/5051980.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/legal-brief-hs2-consultation-ruling/5051980.article</guid>
<description>We look at the three key messages that can be taken from Mr Justice Ouseley’s recent rulings on legal challenges to HS2</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Navigating mixed-use developments</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/navigating-mixed-use-developments/5051526.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/navigating-mixed-use-developments/5051526.article</guid>
<description>The changing environment of work and planning will result in a lot more mixed-use developments - and there are many ways to make these pay </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Identifying owner occupiers</title>
<link>http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/identifying-owner-occupiers/5051259.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.building.co.uk/professional/legal/identifying-owner-occupiers/5051259.article</guid>
<description>The part of Section 106 of the Construction Act designed to safeguard residential occupiers is only applicable if they can prove they intend to move into the property as their residence</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
	