facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Feedback

Monday21 May 2012

Ann Minogue Freelance

Building

Stories by this contributor.

  • The practices of funders' lawyers in 2011

    06 January 2012

    Funders’ lawyers are imposing onerous terms on contractors, passing them off as ‘market standard’. Here’s the kind of shenanigans they got up to last year

  • The trouble with letters of intent and the law

    21 October 2011

    Here’s a case where a ‘side letter’ was relied upon to clarify the key terms under negotiation. The problem is that such documents may not be deemed legally enforceable

  • Dodgy payment practices: Save us from ourselves

    05 August 2011

    Journalism isn’t the only sector guilty of abuses. Construction’s own dodgy payment practices are legendary - but to be rid of them it will have to fall back on its own resources

  • Novation: Let's innovate

    13 May 2011

    A client novates its design team in order to offload risk to the contractor, but in doing so it also loses access to consultants who can offer vital advice. So what’s the alternative?

  • Can we be of any assistance?

    21 January 2011

    ?Like it or not, lawyers are tending to intrude into the adjudication process. Perhaps the industry should stop resisting and treat them as a guiding hand

  • The big law society

    21 May 2010

    Ann Minogue The more disputes are settled in adjudication, the more likely it is that areas outside our industry will have a bearing on how construction law develops

  • Blessed are the peacemakers: Contentious vs non-contentious law

    22 January 2010

    Adjudication has become just like litigation-lite, thanks largely to disputes lawyers gunning for a fight. A less contentious approach might return us to its original aims

  • JCT for major projects: I Love you just the way you are

    18 September 2009

    The clear, efficient and comprehensive JCT Major Project Construction Contract is about as good a form as you’ll find. But don’t go trying to change it …

  • A beginners' guide to English: Compact contracts

    12 June 2009

    You may think it best to make a contract as verbose as possible to ensure it misses nothing, but in reality it’s best to be brief and to the point

  • Friends disunited: Mixing business and pleasure

    20 March 2009

    What’s wrong with agreeing a deal in the pub with a beer, a nod and a wink? After all, you’re mates, aren’t you? Well, sadly, those days are over. You must properly record everything

  • Whatever possessed you?: Early partial possession

    16 January 2009

    Ann Minogue If you’re lucky enough to have a tenant lined up, you might be tempted to give them partial possession so they can make an early start on their fit-out. That way madness lies…

  • Domestic builds: Identifying the rogue element

    18 July 2008

    Things often go awry with domestic projects, but they may not always be the fault of cowboy builders

  • Exclusion clauses: A chink of light

    2008 Issue 18

    Are exclusion clauses enforceable? Hitherto, the courts have shed little light on the matter, but a recent Court of Appeal decision makes things much clearer

  • That’s the way the money goes

    2008 Issue 10

     Paying for materials in order to reserve them is common practice when they are in short supply. Just make sure you follow a few guidelines when doing so to avoid trouble

  • What the war taught us

    2007 issue 45

    The industry launched a campaign three years ago to persuade the government to junk plans for a planning gain supplement and, lo and behold, it succeeded. Now we need to learn the lessons

  • Self-harm for developers

    2007 Issue 28

    Developers always try to impose the same liabilities on their contractors that they themselves are under. This is at best futile and at worst a danger to their own interests

  • Here comes the rain again

    2007 Issue 12

    The oft-discussed Baxall case was about negligence in designing rainwater drainage. So is the Charter case, but here the Court of Appeal has taken a very different view

  • Reflections and predictions

    2007 issue 01

    Wembley remained incomplete, third-party rights grew in popularity and we awoke to the importance of sustainability last year. So what will 2007 hold?

  • Can you direct me to my money?

    2006 issue 50

    LEGAL AID — A contractor is withholding £45,000 until a subcontractor signs a new deal. But can a letter of intent and a purchase order be used to extract payment anyway?

  • Know your rights

    2006 issue 47

    ‘If it ain’t broke, why fix it?’ asked Jeff Brown of collateral warranties. But third-party rights are now used by many big developers as they reduce paperwork, time and money

  • What’s right is right

    2006 issue 43

    The main lesson of Technotrade’s well-documented attempt to use a legal technicality to minimise its liability to a client warns us all of the need to be vigilant

  • Floored by a contract

    2006 issue 40

    A contractor has withheld £250k from a flooring firm and told it the contract states it has to arbitrate directly with the client. How can it best recover the money it is owed?

  • The victims of crime

    2006 issue 35

    When £20,000 worth of windows was stolen from a site, the contractor was landed with a six-week delay. So was the delay subject to an extension of time? If not, who was going to pay for the knock-on costs? Our panel of experts ponder the options…

  • Risk? All yours, mate

    2006 issue 31

    Construction’s understanding of risk is becoming ever more sophisticated in these post-Latham days. Alas, when it comes to risk allocation in procurement, things are rather more primitive

  • Give us our time back

    2006 issue 30

    Legal aid — This month our panel of experts locks horns with a client that has withdrawn an extension of time, sacked the architect and refuses to pay what’s due. Should the contractor down tools, lean on the new architect – or is adjudication the answer?

  • Sorry, its not a runner

    2006 issue 27

    The CIC says its consultants’ contract is aimed at experienced clients, but they’ll be the last to abandon bespoke forms for an agreement that includes an aggregate cap on liabilities

  • A disaster waiting to happen

    2006 issue 26

    Legal aid - This month our panel of experts tackles a dangerous situation at a college where a newly constructed extension is a potential fire hazard. Who is responsible under the design-and-build contract? And who will foot the bill for the remedial work?

  • Two unhappy customers

    2006 issue 21

    This month our panel of legal experts wrestle with the case of an M&E contractor that worked for nothing and a client whose contract administrator certified defective work

  • Game, set-off, match

    2006 issue 14

    Collateral warranties don't often lead to litigation but, when they do, clients must beware of clauses that introduce set-off rights - as these parties discovered

  • Keeping the law in order

    2006 issue 08

    The DTI is to draft a bill to amend the construction act. This is a heroic enterprise, but don't forget it's the courts that really decide what the rules mean

Visit the forum

Sign in

Email Newsletters

I'm searching for in
Desktop Site | Mobile Site