Clare Edwards

  • Comment

    Clash points II

    2001-01-05T00:00:00

    It's unfair to expect contractors to criticise consultants at the tender stage – it will jeopardise their chance of winning the contract. A better solution is to appoint the contractor earlier in the process.

  • Features

    Clash points

    2000-11-03T00:00:00

    Rudi misses the point of prime contracting. It means that most main contractors are subcontractors, too. In any case, as the ultimate holder of risk, it will be in the prime contractor's interests to create a supportive team.

  • Features

    Clash points

    2000-09-29T00:00:00

    The fuel crisis hit construction hard. Now, contractors must convince their clients that they need extensions of time to cope with the delays it caused. Luckily, the force majeure clause in the JCT forms can help.

  • Features

    Clash points

    2000-05-12T00:00:00

    In the post-Construction-Act industry, main contractors and the firms that work for them should not be talking about clash points, but about how to work together to achieve their mutual objectives.

  • Features

    Clash points

    2000-02-18T00:00:00

    Nomination is fine. The problem is that in the past it tended to be another term for abuse of client power – which Ann's proposals for redistributing risk rather bring to mind. But there is a better way …

  • Features

    Clash points

    1999-04-09T00:00:00

    No, it must stay – why should major contractors bear all the risk? Also, Rudi exaggerates the helplessness of subcontractors to pay-when-paid, as well as the amount of money they may lose.