A 100-year life cycle and low energy use were key to the construction of the new Welsh Assembly building. Alison Luke finds out how the team met the quality and environmental requirements.
After the architectural oppressiveness of the Scottish Parliament building with its small, caged windows and solid concrete walls, the latest governmental offering, the new National Assembly for Wales has a refreshingly inviting feel.
Sweeping up from Cardiff Bay in a mass of slate, the three-storey structure has unquestionably met the client’s desire for a landmark building. The striking overhanging roof draws you into the building under waves of cedar cladding through the seeming vastness of the double-level public circulation space. Full height glazing surrounding this open-plan area adds a sense of transparency, suggesting the sense of open government the Assembly wants to portray.
Underneath this glazed structure the main debating chamber and inner workings of the Assembly are securely encased within a concrete ‘box’, which is to all extents and purposes underground. “Security was a big issue on the job and the architect has been quite clever here,” comments Jerry Williams, project director for main contractor Taylor Woodrow Construction.
An inventive mix of architecture and engineering has ensured a natural segregation between the Assembly members and public. This provides the secure environment needed, while allowing the voting public to view the debates from above through glass panels – reinforcing the message of openness. “We’re not presenting the old Houses of Parliament, where you get to a set of doors and can’t get any further. Two-thirds of the building is public space; the areas that aren’t are spaces that are viewable by the public,” says Williams.
Structural services
As well as catering for security, the building’s structure plays a major part in the servicing strategy and has helped it achieve the desired BREEAM Excellent rating (see box ‘Sustaining energy use’). “This is probably one of the best examples of an integrated design you’ll see and it has to be because of the environmental nature of the building,” explains Williams.
This integration encompassed the construction team as well as the structure. “Because it’s a very highly specialised project environmentally, a lot of the basic decisions on what was included in the m&e design go right back to the fundamental feasibility of the building,” states Williams. “It’s not a case of design a building and work out how to service it; the environmental conditions of the building and how we achieve them was the primary driver in the early decisions.”
Add to this the fact the architectural mix of exposed concrete and glazed surfaces meant that distribution routes for the m&e services were limited, and it’s clear that getting the construction team members on board early and working together was a necessity.
“If you’re not aware of decisions such as those made to achieve the BREEAM rating, it would be very easy to undo some of the good work by just making the wrong suggestions,” says Williams.
When Taylor Woodrow won the contract to deliver the Richard Rogers Partnership design, the project had endured several years of well-reported political wranglings and a false start on site. This history meant a design was in place and the scope of works already decided when the firm was appointed. Taylor Woodrow was quick to adopt its Strategic Alliance Partnership (SAP) to ensure the success of the scheme and MJN was selected as the m&e contractor.
Williams explains: “MJN got involved not long after Taylor Woodrow. We went through a two-stage tender with the client that established prelims, basic ideas and the design team. MJN had been selected at that point and worked with us solidly through the main tendering period.
“This is probably one of the best examples of an integrated design you’ll see – it has to be because of the environmental nature of the building.”
“One of the questions when we went with the SAP was how much to put into the m&e contractor’s package,” explains Williams. “It was decided that we would go with one large package taking onboard the commissioning of services, controls and even things like the syphonic rainwater system.” This decision was made due to the complexities of the project to improve co-ordination between the different areas of work.
“It does mean that the demands on the m&e contractor are much higher. They must have a team of people who are used to project managing rather than just being specialists in their own fields. Then effectively they become part of our management team,” Williams adds.
MJN’s close involvement at these early stages led to some fundamental changes to allow for the practicalities of the build. One significant area of the contractor’s work was distribution of the services. “Around 60-70% of the services are in a void across the underside of the building,” explains Peter Davies, contracts manager for MJN Colston.
MJN’s influence saw this substantially increase in size. “If we’d followed the consultant’s advice I don’t think we’d have got the services in,” states Williams. “That’s no discredit to the consultant, it’s just getting to that next level of detail.” The detailed design of the m&e distribution had to be completed prior to the casting of the concrete as many of the routes were cast into the structure to meet the architectural desires for clean walls (see ‘A sequenced solution’). “The integration with the fabric of the building has been a big factor all the way through,” stresses Davies. “It involved a lot of interfaces with other trade packages. Things that would have been a minor challenge on a conventionally designed project, have presented big challenges here because decisions had to be made so early in the process.”
Making decisions
There have been few design changes on the project, but this did mean the client had to be sure what it wanted right from the start. If distribution routes had to be cast with the first concrete pours, the contractors had to know where power etc would be needed. “We discussed that with the client at tender stage and set some fairly aggressive targets in terms of issuing that information to us,” says Williams. “The building does have flexibility built into it, but in order to get a proper integrated design you must have all the parameters up front.”
MJN continued the SAP through its supply chain to ensure a thorough co-ordination of the design. Davies explains: “It wasn’t a case that we got prices from x amount of subcontractors – we selected subcontractors from the start and they worked with us to develop the design, so they’ve had the same input as us.”
Both Davies and Williams report positively on the outcome of the management approach used on the project. “One of the main benefits of the SAP is we concentrate on the job and getting it done rather than spending time throwing letters at each other,” says Davies. “There hasn’t been one contractual letter written for this project.”
While the official opening is set for St David’s Day 2006, construction is now virtually complete and the fit-out is well underway. When Assembly members finally make their way across the link bridges from their base in adjoining Crickhowell House, they are sure to be impressed. If not by low energy conditions keeping them cool, by the exceptional design and materials used throughout – the 100 year life and prerequisite for quality enabling whole life costs to be used to great effect.
Sustaining energy use
Part of the beauty of this building is not so much what m&e systems we’ve put in, but how these systems work with the building or indeed how much of the m&e systems are the building,” says Williams.
The brief demanded that it achieve an Excellent BREEAM rating, plus meet the Assembly’s constitutional responsibilities for sustainable development. This has been approached from two angles: first to minimise energy use and waste; second to provide the energy needed by renewable technologies. Fundamental to the services strategy were the use of natural ventilation and daylight.
The striking funnel rising from the depths of the debating chamber through the full height of the building is the most visual result of this strategy. Air is supplied to the chamber via floor level diffusers, then rises by passive stack effect out through the funnel.
An adjustable rotating cowl at its apex allows control over the throughput. The funnel also provides daylight into the chamber; a mirrored underside to the cowl bouncing daylight through the funnel lining of aluminium tubes to provide a diffused light into the space.
In the committee chambers lining either side of the building, roof-lights provide outlets for the air plus daylight. These have automatic blinds controlled by sensors that calculate the angle of the sun and are linked to fully dimmable lights, adjusting as needed to maximise daylight use while minimising glare.
Other key methods of reducing energy demand were a high level of insulation, a less stringent control of temperatures in transitory areas and continuing the integrated theme of the building, the use of the exposed concrete structure as thermal mass.
To provide the energy needed two main systems have been installed: a wood-chip boiler to supply the heating system; plus a ground source heat pump system, which can be used simultaneously for heating and cooling. For this, 27 boreholes 100 m deep have been drilled underneath the building. “One of the main drivers for the ground source system was the whole life costing; it far outweighed any of the other options and was very easy to justify as we’re constructing a building with a 100 year life,” comments Davies.
Payback was initially calculated at 25 years, however client changes have meant more cooling is being supplied by the wellfield, hence payback will be faster. “The biggest thing was understanding how these systems work and bringing them online; general distribution is no different,” he adds.
A sequenced solution
The integration of m&e services with the Assembly Building’s structure threw up an unusual and challenging build sequence. “It’s the first project I’ve been on where the m&e services were started before the building,” says Davies. “The first activity on site was the borehole wellfield for the ground source heating, which had to go in before the basement slab of the building,” he explains.
Directly after the foundations were complete, the slab for the services void was poured. Then, rather than pour the ground floor slab, which is effectively the lid on the services undercroft, the remainder of the building’s concrete frame was completed.
During this period the m&e contractor was involved, ensuring services routes were allowed for and conduit installed as necessary within the concrete frame. This sequence effectively enabled a faster build time.
As the completion of the upper floors of the building basically created a sealed box, MJN Colston was able to install services in the void while the remainder of the structure was being completed and the roof being installed. Williams explains: “What this did was allow the bulk of the large m&e installation to be done in relatively sensible conditions. We put all the services in then put the ground floor slab over the top afterwards.
Installation of the roof also meant close integration of the project teams and a strict sequencing of work. With services to be integrated into the ceiling MJN began work as soon as the roof was watertight.
“We started at the same time as the ceiling contractor and worked with them throughout” says Davies. Installation started from the rear of the building and was divided into six sections or ‘bays’, which were determined by the architectural curves in the ceiling, one curved area being a bay.
The building was scaffolded to ceiling height in two bay sections at a time. The area underneath the live roof bay was treated as sterile, with works at ground level being allowed either side, but not within it. The distribution routes were worked out before we got to site, so we knew where we were going before we started,” stresses Davies, “which is one of the reasons the sequence developed.
We couldn’t have the whole roof, so we had to organise our systems by bay; we split the circuitry up into bays as well, so it had quite a fundamental effect. The completion and snagging of all works within a bay took six to eight weeks. After around four weeks, work would begin on the next bay along. Williams says: “We got to the point where the roof was on and the services installed, then we could work on the inside.”
Profile
Players
Project: National Assembly for Wales
Client:National Assembly for Wales
Project manager: TPS Consult
Architect: Richard Rogers Partnership
M&E consulting engineer: BDSP Partnership
Lighting designer: BDSP Partnership
Main contractor: Taylor Woodrow Construction
M&E contractor: MJN Colston
Contract details
Tender date: May 2003
Form of contract: GC Works 1 amended
Contract period: 113 weeks
Providers
Mechanical suppliers:
AHUs: Flakt Woods
Boilers: Stokvis UK (gas boiler), Wood Energy (biomass boiler)
Control valves: TAC Satchwell
Computer room a/c: Liebert Hiross Ductwork,Isotemp Ductwork
DX systems (VRV): Daikin
Extract fans: Nuaire
Fan coil units: Flakt Woods
Floor grilles: Fraser Engineering, Gilberts, Shako
Flues: Chimney Centres
Ground source chilled water system: Groenholland UK
Heat exchangers: Rycroft
Insulation system: Multitherm Insulation Perimeter heating: Meinertz
Pumps and pressurisation: Grundfos
Radiant panels: Buco & Fraser Engineering
Radiators: Hudevad
Raised floors: Accyss Projects
Security blockers and bollards: Allen Fencing
Sound attenuation: Allaway Acoustics
Underfloor heating: Warmafloor UK
VAV boxes: Flakt Woods
Water heaters: Oso Hot Water
Electrical suppliers:
BMS: TAC Satchwell
CCTV: CDS
Cable: BICC
Cable management: Legrand
Controls: TAC Satchwell
Electrical distribution: Tyco Electronics
Electrical accessories: MK
Emergency luminaries: Emergency Power Systems
Fire alarm/detection: Chubb
Floor boxes: CMS
HV switchgear: Western Power Distribution
Lighting controls: Luxmate Controls Luminaires: AC/DC,Bega,Concordmarlin, Continental, Coughtrie, Crescent Lighting, Erco, iGuzzini, Louis Poulson, Samode, Thorn, WE-EF, Wila, Whitecroft, Woodhouse
LV switchgear: Tyco Electronics
Power busbar: Siemens
Public address: Chubb
Security equipment: CDS
Standby generation: Existing (Cummins Diesel),
Trace heating: Multitherm Insulation
Underfloor heating: Warmafloor UK
Voice and data equipment: Molex Premise Networks
Prices
Total: £41 million
Mechanical services: £4 million
Electrical services: £3 million
Source
Electrical and Mechanical Contractor
No comments yet