Visitors to November's M&E Event enjoyed a taster of the massive task facing services contractors on the Heathrow Terminal 5 project. Installation is now well underway
The installation of m&e services at Heathrow Terminal 5 took a huge leap forwards as 2006 approached. After years of highly detailed planning and co-ordination, the installation of the central service chimneys in the main terminal building began.
Five chimneys, each weighing around 100 tonnes and reaching 15-m high are being installed along the central spine of the new building, T5A. These, plus three similar, smaller chimneys positioned on the airside stretch of the building (closest to the runway) are central to the m&e services strategy and provide the comfort cooling of T5A. In mid-November the first of the five main chimneys began to take shape on site.
Responsibility for the design and installation of the m&e services on the majority of T5A was awarded to Amec.
It has been working on the services design since November 2002.
Structural design
One of the most unusual and successful aspects of the chimney design at T5 was Amec's decision to modularise much of the m&e plant and prefabricate it offsite.
All eight chimneys are constructed of prefabricated steel modules, based over four floor levels. These modules comprise the vast majority of the m&e services needed for the terminal building including general ventilation ductwork, smoke extract, kitchen extract systems, control systems, cabling containment, lighting, small power, communications infrastructure and fire alarms.
As well as containing the services, the chimneys were designed holistically with the building and provide a continuation of the structure to the roof. Items such as escape and access stairways and floors for the services maintenance were built into the prefabricated modules. The development of the chimneys was carried out using 3D modelling and collaborative working with the supply chain (see box, ‘Model features').
"Ideas were developed around the needs of the project," explains George Adams, Amec's T5 engineering manager. "The key driver for the modules is the time benefit - to save time and give programme assurance. The business benefits from this far outweigh any capital savings." The use of prefabrication reduced traditional onsite interfaces by around 60%. The resulting lower level of operatives and build activity on site, contributed to programme certainty.
"The key benefit was a six-month reduction on the critical path of the programme, which was estabished three years ago. Modularisation was not an add-on, it is an integral part of the building," Adams stresses. "It's getting close to plug-and-play technology."
Off-site working
Around 60% of the services were prefabricated offsite. "Any more than this and it would not have been cost-effective," explains Adams.
There were two types of services module used in the project, large-scale versions that slotted together to form the chimneys and plantrooms, plus smaller units for distribution of services around the site. Prefabrication was split between two locations according to module size. The larger units were manufactured by Babcock Engineering Services at its facility in Rosyth, Fife; the distribution units were produced by WS Britland in Dover, Kent. "The Scottish site had the capacity and size to deal with the large modules; the Kent facility is more focused and able for mass production," explains Adams. The integrated supply chain approach used at T5 meant the various suppliers delivered directly to the assembly yards to Amec's instructions.
"The main benefit of the prefabrication sites chosen was that they had a very large capability, so if Amec wanted to increase the number of manufacturing streams to meet the demands of the build programme this was possible," explains Adams. "Say there is one production line making the modules, a second, third and fourth line could be started up alongside this, duplicating the work and increasing the number of modules being produced at the same time," he adds.
This flexibility to change manfacturing output to meet the demands of the site was essential. "Parallel manufacturing was a major part of the prefabrication strategy and the ability to set up multiple streams was vital," stresses Adams.
Manufacturing of a complete airside chimney from cutting of the steel to the finished product ready for installation takes around five weeks. The main chimneys also follow this five-week programme. This timescale was dictated by the factory's production cycle. "The factories were confident about making the modules in five weeks," explains Adams. "This is where the flexibility to have extra production streams was essential, so that if more modules were needed over the five-week period, another stream comes online to produce them."
The chimneys were erected at the prefabrication yards and inspected before being dismantled for delivery to site (see ‘Building blocks'). One of the few components to be installed traditionally is the cabling; a design exercise showed this to be the most cost-effective method.
The services are set to complete by March 2007, with commissioning due to end by September 2007. T5A is due to usher its first passengers to the skies on 30 March 2008.
In-flight services
- The total project cost is £4.2 billion
- The T5 site covers 260 hectares, increasing the size of Heathrow by around 50%
- T5 includes 16 major projects and over 147 sub-projects valued at £30-150 million
- 60 new aircraft stands are being created
- The eight storey main terminal (T5A) span 396 x 176 m and peaks at 40 m high
- The time to build T5 is estimated at 37 million man-hours (including off-site work)
- Offsite prefabrication of m&e services modules reduced onsite programme interfaces by up to 60%
- 60% of m&e components were manufactured off site
- The energy centre provides 46·5 MW of low temperature hot water and 29 MW of chilled water to the T5 buildings
- Around 60 000 operatives will work on T5 over the project duration
- 30 million passengers are expected yearly
Time to take-off
1985
Initial planning stage
1989
Architect Richard Rogers Partnership wins a national competition to design T5
17 February 1993
Following further development of the design BAA submits planning application
20 November 2001
Planning permission is granted subject to almost 700 conditions
November 2002
Groundworks begin
March 2003
Design and development of m&e services modules begins
July 2003
Site preparation and enabling works
November 2003
Construction of T5A superstructure begins on site
2004
First m&e services module delivered
April 2004
Diversion of two rivers around the site is completed
June 2004
Construction of energy centre begins
June 2005
First airside chimney assembled on site
November 2005
Energy centre brought online
Spring 2006
Energy centre handover scheduled
September 2007
Commissioning of m&e services to complete
October 2007 – March 2008
Handover period
30 March 2008
Main terminal (T5A) scheduled to open to the public
2011
Completion of satellite terminal (T5C) due
Building blocks
Both main and airside chimneys for the T5A terminal building were constructed on-site after the structure was virtually watertight. A means of getting them into the building had thus to be planned for at design stage.
The size of the large modules for the central chimneys added to the complexities of the process, weighing around 25 tonnes and measuring 8·5 x 4·5 x 4·5 m. The solution here was to build a series of elevated platforms at one end of the terminal building, individually crane the modules onto these and move them into position by trolley 1.
To use this method a section of the external wall had to be completed after the chimneys were in position and the platforms removed. “Hence the need for the early involvement of other members of the construction team, as the cladding contractors for example must know to leave the loading area clear,” stresses George Adams, Amec’s T5 engineering manager.
The modules are loaded onto specially constructed pneumatic platforms with tolerances of 610 mm, which raise them into position and ‘build’ the chimney from the bottom upwards 2. Once a section of the chimney is in position it is jacked up to height, the next section is slotted into position below and the raised section(s) lowered and the two bolted together. “To build from the top to bottom would have been much more expensive,” explains Adams.
The centre of the top modules are prefabricated as a roof well and form part of the final structure. Prior to their installation a temporary roof section is in position, when the chimney reaches almost ceiling level, this is removed, the chimney is jacked up into its final position and a flexible membrane attached between the roof and chimney.
“The lifting equipment used was designed for this project, but from components used elsewhere,” explains Adams. “We tried to use standard components as much as possible as they can then be used on other projects later.” Lifting one section of the chimney by the 5·5 m needed takes around 45 minutes; an entire central chimney can be installed in around three to four days.
The alternative way to install the chimneys would have been to carry the core structure to the roof traditionally rather than including this in the modules. “This would have meant a duplication of steelwork and the service team would have had to have waited until the structure was complete before they could begin their installation,” explains Adams. “Alternatively the core structure could have been built and the services traditionally fitted afterwards: but it is better to build in services in a factory environment for safety,” he adds.
The smaller, airside chimneys were craned in modular sections through the roof directly into position. A single chimney could be completed in a day, so all modules were completed, dispatched to site and positioned outside the building on a just-in-time basis. These are topped by a ‘penthouse’ section which includes the discharge louvres and a maintenance room 3.
Source
Electrical and Mechanical Contractor
No comments yet