The 2003 Inbucon salary survey shows housing enjoying above-inflation wage rises. But associations aren't complacent. Now they're finding other ways to boost recruitment – employee-friendly working practices, job satisfaction and final-salary pensions.
Stiff competition from the private sector continues to push up wages, but registered social landlords are discovering that pay packets are not their only bargaining chip. That's the finding of the latest survey of RSL salaries from Inbucon. The survey , which covered 93 associations and 8551 jobs, found that perks and fringe benefits are increasingly important to housing sector job seekers.

The average rise in the social housing sector over the past year was 3.9%. That's slightly above inflation, which is currently hovering around the 3% mark. But this average is misleading: it encompasses wide variations across levels and functions.

Chief executives' pay rose faster than those lower down the ranks, building on a trend highlighted in last year's survey (HT 30 May 2002, page 32). But chief executives were also the most likely to receive no pay increase at all. The national median pay rose from £63,100 to £67,698, or 7.3%, but at the bottom of the scale, nursing home managers received just 1.2% more; their average pay rose from £21,650 to £21,904. Top salaries showed the greatest variation, depending not on location but on the size of the association. They ranged from less than £45,656 at RSLs with turnover of less than £2m to more than £102,858 at £20m-plus organisations.

To put these figures into perspective, a Guardian survey last year found that the average salary for local authority chief executives, who typically run much larger organisations than their RSL counterparts, was £103,860. Private sector chief executives earned an average of £391,547.

A talent competition, where particularly gifted people can name their price, has become the norm

Terrie Hughes, the Inbucon pay and benefits specialist who compiled the survey, says a talent competition, where particularly gifted individuals can name their price – also known as "the Beckham factor" – has become the norm. Breaking away from grade-based pay-scales in areas where demand is high allows housing associations to tempt the sector's top scorers. Hughes says: "Traditional evaluations that measured the job, not the individual doing it or how well it was being done, have been taken out of the equation." The survey found a quarter  X X of associations now look at local pay rates and employee performance in addition to living costs when setting salary levels.

The economic downturn currently affecting the private sector means associations have a greater choice of applicants. Although RSLs cannot match private-sector salaries, they are rethinking their approaches to potential employees and publicising the previously hidden rewards a career in housing can bring (see Perk life, page 29).

Aside from hard cash, factors that can tip the balance in favour of the not-for-profit sector include family-friendly policies, paternity pay, life assurance, generous employment benefits and sick pay well above the statutory minimum. Inbucon found that 77% of the RSLs it surveyed operated a flexible hours programme and 65% a job-sharing scheme, benefits that private firms have been slow to offer.

There’s not such a long-hours culture in housing, by any stretch of the imagination peter wallop,

former private sector employee

Peter Wallop, group personnel manager at Southern Housing Group, was lured from a private-sector job by the prospect of a better work-life balance. He used to work for a global hotel chain where 70-hour weeks were the norm. He says: "There's not such a long-hours culture in housing, by any stretch of the imagination." Experience at London & Quadrant Housing Trust backs this up. Sally Jacobson, group human resources director, says the trust has seen applications rise since it was included in The Sunday Times' list of the best companies to work for (HT 7 March 2003, page 12).

A major bonus in the eyes of recruits is that many RSLs still offer final-salary pension schemes, increasingly rare in the private sector. Catherine Diamond, a human resources consultant at Mann Weaver Drew, says the high profile of pensions in the media has brought the issue to the front of people's minds. All the associations surveyed by Inbucon offered a pension, two-thirds of them final salary schemes.

Not least, of course, there's the job satisfaction that comes from making a difference to people's lives. "The opportunity to work in a sector that's providing essential services to the community and doing a worthwhile job – that's very attractive," says Sandy Staff, human resources consultant at Conway Staff Partnership. Sunderland Housing Group, for instance, has received a great deal of publicity since it was created by the transfer of Sunderland's stock in 2001, and senior human resources adviser Gillian Hunter believes high local awareness of the group's development projects has meant a steady stream of applicants.

Hire authority

“Our problem is that we may not get too many replies to the advert so we have to go out again,” says Davina Boakye, group director of corporate services at East Thames Housing Group, which has about 250 staff. East Thames has tried to make its advertising as effective as possible to get the most replies from every ad. Boakye says: “We’re looking at how we can make adverts more employee-centric. Some have been rewritten to enable people to see the benefits more clearly.” Larger, more colourful adverts have also helped to attract recruits. So far, in only one case has East Thames decided a job needed to move up a pay grade. Boakye believes housing associations need to market themselves more actively. East Thames recently received 700 requests for information from just one two-day recruitment fair, and it is working with four other RSLs to develop a graduate scheme.

Unions on the rise

Reacting to market pay levels may help housing associations attract the best managers, but such commercial concerns can also make staff feel that their pay, conditions or jobs are vulnerable. This can lead to an increase in trade union activity. The most prominent housing sector unions, Amicus, Unison and the T&G, have 7000, 15,000 and 4800 members in housing asssociations respectively. In some cases, employees feel they are not able to negotiate with their employers on pay and conditions and prefer the back-up of a union. Also, employers themselves can see the benefits of union activity, such as the training they provide for workers. After a 2001 staff survey, the Peabody Trust actively encouraged staff to vote for recognition of Amicus within the organisation. Unions are pushing for greater involvement in the housing sector. The T&G’s strategy for growth includes expansion within associations, and a pilot project for involvement at English Churches Housing Group has seen the number of members there rise from 160 to more than 700 in six months.

Perk life

Employees at London & Quadrant can be in no doubt of the superior benefits the housing association offers – it’s just published two booklets outlining them in detail and distributed them among its 700 staff. Benefits for our People documents holidays, flexible working schemes, pensions and sick pay, plus offers from insurers and lenders, health plans and discounts on electrical goods, wine and days out. Rewarding our People tells staff how their hard work will be recognised by awards for individual and team achievements, suggestion schemes and an average of £1100 spent on training each employee every year. Group human resources director Sally Jacobson says the opportunity to take sabbatical leave or learn a foreign language also helps retain staff. “The benefits make a real difference. People don’t go to an organisation to get cheap pet insurance, but once they’re here, there’s a whole raft of measures to keep them.”