Last year slightly more than 70,000 households claimed asylum in this country; half of them will be allowed to settle permanently in the UK. Before 1999, most refugees chose to settle among their communities in London. Since the 1999 Immigration and Asylum Act, asylum seekers are being dispersed around the country, usually to low-demand areas. This means new communities are bound to emerge, sometimes in previously mono-cultural areas. A fifth of the roughly 50,000 refugee households that are currently in the care of NASS (the Home Office unit established to administer refugee dispersal) are settled in the Yorkshire and Humberside area, one of the country's largest dispersal regions.
With this in mind, a recent HACT study, Between NASS and a Hard Place, explored the level of relevant community development initiatives and broad levels of housing need and provision among refugee communities in Yorkshire and Humberside.
The study's key message is that dispersal arrangements have been made in a policy vacuum. The Home Office's refugee integration strategy seeks to develop refugees' potential and encourage their settlement throughout the country. The strategy states that housing and community development underpin other aspects of settlement and integration. But relevant policy areas, such as community cohesion, neighbourhood renewal, market renewal and strategies to tackle homelessness, have barely touched on this agenda so far.
Beyond filling empties, the system is not effectively meeting its broader objective of longer-term settlement away from areas of high housing pressure in the South-east. All too often asylum seekers are left facing harassment in deprived areas where services are overstretched and insensitive to specific needs. Given the numbers and diversity of the newly emerging communities – 104 different nationalities are currently placed in the Yorkshire and Humberside region – it's little wonder many return to London, where refugees still form a large proportion of the official and "hidden" homeless.
"Guesstimates" of the number of refugees who may need housing in a dispersal area are crude, and access to housing woefully inadequate. Ironically, once asylum seekers are given a positive decision by the Home Office, they face a housing crisis. The otherwise standard 28-day notice period is far too short within the context of overlapping bureaucratic systems that are not geared up to provide culturally appropriate access to and targeted services for these newly emerging communities. Not surprisingly, two years into the dispersal system, in some areas refugees now make up the largest proportion of registered homeless people.
But the study also found evidence of some very positive initiatives, and of refugee communities not only playing a critical part in holding the rather inadequate system together, but also being a force for renewal in some deprived areas.
So, what can housing providers in other areas do to tap into this force for renewal?
New communities have been a force for renewal in some deprived areas; housing providers can tap into this energy
Source
Housing Today
Postscript
Heather Petch is director of the Housing Associations' Charitable Trust. HACT's refugee programme provides grants and capacity building support to refugee community organisations and housing providers. HACT is seeking to raise £70,000 to match its £200,000 European Refugee Fund grant. A summary of Between NASS and a Hard Place is available from HACT on 020 7247 7800
No comments yet