Heavy push doors and steps without stairlifts aren’t just an upsetting barrier to disabled people – from today, they could be illegal. Yet the offices of housing providers are often shockingly inaccessible for wheelchair users, as Kate Freeman discovered when she tested them with the help of John Walsh.
Today marks the deadline for compliance with part three of the 1995 Disability Discrimination Act. It introduces stricter rules on physical accessibility that mean that from 1 October, service providers should have made “reasonable adjustments” to all premises to which the public has access (HT 17 September, page 49). How this will be applied in practice has yet to be tested in the courts, but the Disability Rights Commission has already made clear its intention to find and push for prosecution of service providers found to be lacking. DRC research published this week found that 80% of British high streets were unprepared for the changes and almost a quarter of shops visited were rated “poor” or “very poor”. And an informal survey by the National Housing Federation said just 48% of housing associations expect to comply by October 2005.
The act has been almost 10 years coming and has been given much publicity by the Department for Work and Pensions and the DRC in recent months, so few social housing providers can claim to be ignorant of its impact. You might expect them to be at the forefront of good practice in accessibility. But are they?
As the deadline loomed, HT sent one social housing tenant and wheelchair user to visit five London housing providers to find out.
THE RESEARCHER
John Walsh, 55, has been a tenant of Habinteg Housing Association for 10 years. He works as a civil servant in the technical directorate of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and lives in a one-bed flat with warden support in Hackney, east London. He has limited movement of his arms and legs, so he gets about by motorised wheelchair and an adapted transit van with an electronic ramp at the back for him to get in and out. He is very happy with Habinteg’s accommodation and offices – but we asked him to take a look at other nearby associations and councils he might have to deal with if he moved.
ISLINGTON COUNCIL
First up is Islington council’s housing department in Highbury, north London – and Walsh hits the first obstacle straight away. Although the council doesn’t provide parking for visitors, there are two disabled parking bays, but they’re inside a barrier. A quick trip up to reception is something that Walsh couldn’t do unless he had already parked his car, so Housing Today intervenes. The receptionist seems thrown by the idea that someone with a disability might be visiting. “It’s a closed office,” he says. “Nobody is seen without an appointment.” And if he had an appointment, where would he park? “We could probably arrange something,” he says.
Even with an appointment, Walsh wouldn’t get into the disabled space today because one car with a disabled badge is parked at an angle, forcing the car of a non-disabled owner to block the other disabled space. Fortunately, Walsh finds a space on the road outside – a traffic warden confirms that a blue badge lets you park for free in Islington. “That’s good,” Walsh comments. “Some London councils don’t do this or have their own badges. I’m always getting tickets from wardens who don’t notice my badge.”
Getting into the office proves no problem – there’s a long ramp, which Walsh speeds up in no time. Despite the “closed office” policy, the reception is busy and there is a free phone so people can ring the council’s housing advisers.
But this is no use to Walsh, who can’t pick it up. The receptionist confirms they have no speakerphone and proffers a special handset rest that could balance on someone’s shoulder – but it’s behind the desk, which is high up, and certainly not very private, unlike the phone for general use.
“Their accessibility is okay but the phone is a problem,” Walsh says.
It’s a wasted journey. The entrance is up a stairway. There is an intercom – at the top of the stairs
NEWLON HOUSING TRUST
Newlon Housing Trust’s headquarters is on busy Hoxton Street in east London. Although there are parking spaces in front of the entrance, the kerb doesn’t slope down at this point, so Walsh has to venture out onto the road alongside traffic so he can get up a ramp at a zebra crossing. “This happens a lot because people park next to ramps all the time,” he says.
The next issue is Newlon’s door – it’s not automatic, so Walsh has to drive his chair towards it and use his weight to push it open. “This is a common problem,” he says. “Pushing a door in with your wheelchair is not so difficult for me, although it might be for some people with less strength. Trying to pull it open against my chair would be very hard.”
Walsh then notices a sign on the inside of the door directing visitors to press a button if they can’t open the door – but it’s too high for him to reach. “I would have to use my nose to press that and they can be stiff or recessed in so I can’t push them very hard.”
Once inside, the receptionists are friendly – but the desk comes up to Walsh’s neck, so they have to stand up to talk to him. But he says he is used to high desks. “This is fairly typical. I’m okay if I need to sign something because I write with my mouth. But for other wheelchair users who write with their hands, I imagine it could be a problem.”
MOSAIC HOMES
Not far away in Hoxton is the main building of Mosaic Homes, formerly New Islington & Hackney Housing Association. It is also not far from Walsh’s current home. He manages to park outside and makes his way down the street, circumnavigating high kerbs by travelling along the busy road. But it’s a wasted journey. The entrance is up a steep stairway. There is an intercom – at the top of the stairs. Walsh smiles grimly: it’s the sort of problem he encounters every day.
The receptionist admits she doesn’t know what to suggest when told a person in a wheelchair is trying to get in. Someone else tells Walsh that if he’s interested in getting on Mosaic’s register, he’d need to go to another office. But under the act, any office open to the public should be accessible.
“If I wanted to enquire about anything here, I wouldn’t be able to get access.”
Walsh leaves none the wiser about the facilities inside. “The steps were wide enough to put a chair lift in. They could have done that, but they haven’t,” he points out.
We’ve only got the pack on paper. I could photocopy
it bigger for herDerbyshire Dales Council
HACKNEY COUNCIL
After Mosaic, Hackney council’s housing advice and homelessness centre is a relief. It’s on a quiet road with metered parking, and the entrance is level with the pavement. It even has an automatic door. Inside, the reception desk is lower down, so the receptionists can talk to Walsh face-to-face. There are a number of meeting rooms off the main waiting room, and it has a lift to all floors of the building. It’s also the only place Walsh visited on that day to have a hearing loop facility for hearing aid users.
Walsh is impressed. “This is the best place I’ve been to today,” he says. “Automatic doors are the easiest type of door, and next best would be two-way push doors.” But they’re not common. Automatic doors are usually a feature of larger hotels or office blocks, but tend to be less common in smaller offices. “Doors I can’t open myself are frustrating, because it’s so much hassle when I have to wait for someone to let me.”
KINGSMEAD HOMES
The final visit is to Kingsmead Homes, a small subsidiary of Shaftesbury Housing Association that looks after 907 flats on an estate in Clapton, east London.
Even though it’s a small association, the first signs are good: near the entrance the ground of the car park slopes to make a ramp up to the main door. The door itself has an intercom next to it, which is too high for Walsh to reach. But the receptionist inside is quick off the mark and buzzes him in as soon as she sees him.
Once inside, though, the receptionist’s desk towers above Walsh. And it is made worse by a vertical barrier that has been added as a security measure on top. “I am struck by the height of the barrier,” Walsh says. The receptionist is apologetic and explains: “It was put in for safety to stop people reaching over the desk. We have had a few people trying to assault staff before.”
Walsh nods. “They have to have security, so I understand the reason for the barrier.
But ideally, it would be good to have a release mechanism or some kind of openable window. A lot of people don’t think about access when designing these things.”
Paper jam
The DDA affects all aspects of accessibility, including information available to tenants. HT called landlords to ask: My grandmother lives in London and is interested in moving to another area. She is losing her sight – can you send her some information in a format she can use?
Derbyshire Dales council
Handles applications for about 3000 registered social landlord units, Derbyshire
“We’ve only got the pack in paper form. I’m afraid it’s not in large print at the moment. I know it’s being looked at but I am not sure when it might be changed. I could photocopy it bigger for her and send it out in the next few days. We don’t have Braille or audio tape – I’d have to find out if this could be done.”
Family Housing Association Manchester
3714 units, Manchester
“I am not aware that we have audio or Braille, it’s a question I have never been asked before. Maybe people get friends to help with their applications. I am sorry, everything is printed in regular print, we make packs up to go out if people want to go on waiting lists.”
“Is it possible to get something on audio?”
“Just bear with me a second …” (A minute passes)
“One of my colleagues believes the equality manager was working on something to this effect but we don’t know how far it’s gone.”
(Equality officer calls back a few hours later)
“Our sheltered housing booklet has 12 inserts and we’ve got it on CD. Does she want tape or CD?”
“Tape, please.”
“If it’s a particular place she’s interested in living, we can have that booklet transferred to tape. It will take a couple of days. I could also get her a large-print application form if that would help.”
Ujima
1915 units, based in Wembley, north London
“We can get things translated or, if she has any special needs we can order information on Braille or audio. If it’s Braille or audio tapes, it takes up to 14 days.”
“Do you have it in large print as well?”
“I think so, that would take about two weeks as well.”
“Does she have to pay for this?”
“No, it’s free.”
Housing 21
13,469 units, based in Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire
“I don’t think we have any audio tapes for people who are applying for housing. We have in-house audio and large-print information for our existing tenants, but not anything for people at the initial stage. I am awfully sorry, we don’t do Braille.
“We like new applicants to arrange to meet up with a court manager and view a property with them after they have received the pack.
“It would probably be better for her to ring the customer service enquiry manager first and have a chat about the type of area she would like to live in. She can then arrange to go and view a property with the court manager.”
East Lindsey council
Handles applications for 6500 RSL units, Lincolnshire
“I am not sure, but I can find out if we do have anything like that. We do have an application form in large-print that basically gives you information about the housing list.”
“Do you have it in Braille or on audio tape?”
“I’ll just see if we can help you.”
(Pause)
“Unfortunately I don’t think we can. The only thing I could suggest is you could maybe contact her local authority and we could send them the form and they could do a home visit and fill in the form for her.”
How accessible are your WebSites?
Under the DDA, your website should also be accessible to disabled people, so we did a snapshot review of two council and three housing association websites chosen at random. Chris Goodrich of social housing specialist Teme Consulting subjected each home page to an automated test using online tool Bobby – http://bobby.watchfire.com. They were tested against the “A” or minimum accessibility rating of the World Wide Web Consortium’s Web Accessibility Initiative.
These, and additional pages chosen at random, whether the site offers a text-only format that makes it easier to see the text and is better for a text-to-voice screen reader; whether images were tagged with a short description so they can be “read” by a screen reader; whether text can be resized using the browser and whether there was a site map, which aids navigation by users of a keyboard rather than a mouse.
The tests were done using Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser.
Carrick council
www.carrick.gov.uk
This site works very hard. Images and links were tagged, but almost too much as irrelevant labelling became irritating using a text-to-voice reader. The three-column layout was a bit of a pain with the text-to-voice reader as it scanned horizontally across the columns, treating them as though they were a single block of text. The site wasn’t available in text-only format but can be printed this way.
“A” rating? YES
Are images tagged? YES
Can text be resized? YES
Text-only format available? NO
Site map? YES
Stars out of five: 3*
Newcastle council
www.newcastle.gov.uk
Not bad in many respects, although let down by little details. Changing the text size in Explorer showed limited adjustment but threw out elements of the layout. Decorative images were rightly excluded from the labels attached to pictures. The text-to-voice reader worked well for the home page, apart from the search tool. In other sections it skipped over section headings and failed to distinguish between two separate blocks of information. Other issues possibly arise from what looks like an absence of consistent styling across the site.
“A” rating? YES
Are images tagged? YES
Can text be resized? NO
Text-only format available? YES
Site map? YES
Stars out of five: 3.5*
Hundred Houses Society
www.hhs.org.uk
A site with potential, but it trips up on a few items that should be easy to rectify. They should lose the scrolling banner on the home page and the background image on the navigation bar – it reduces the legibility of the navigation text, which needs to be in a different typeface. The job of the text-to-voice reader was made more difficult by the use of tables for layout. Only the main text can be resized – navigation bar prompts remain the same size.
“A” rating? NO
Are images tagged? NO
Can text be resized? YES
Text-only format available? NO
Site map? NO
Stars out of five: 2*
William Sutton Housing Association
www.williamsutton.org.uk
A well put-together site. All the images and logos are labelled, apart from the In Business logo on the home page. However, the colour scheme may not give sufficient contrast for those with low or poor vision – particularly when it is used for headings. In the News section there are numerous links that don’t make sense on their own because they are either a date or just say “read more” – another problem for a screen reader.
“A” rating? YES
Are images tagged? YES
Can text be resized? YES
Text-only format available? NO
Site map? YES
Stars out of five: 3.5*
Ashiana Housing Association
www.ashianahousing.co.uk
Another site with potential, but it should lose the animated introduction. The navigation bar does not resize with text. Its failure to label images means it flunked the Bobby test and text-to-voice was made difficult by use of tables for layout. A little work needed.
“A” rating? NO
Are images tagged? NO
Can text be resized? YES
Text-only format available? NO
Site map? NO
Stars out of five: 2*
For more on web access, turn to page 37
Source
Housing Today
No comments yet