Mrs Giles claimed the clause was unlawful as it set out no criteria for the exercise of discretion and no reasons had been given for its application in her case.
Her claim was dismissed. The council's officers and committee had clearly considered the relevant personal circumstances before applying the clause. There was no duty to give reasons. The clause itself was lawful despite conferring a general discretion. The law gave a council wide discretion on the content of its scheme.
Source
Housing Today
Reference
Council allocation schemes change dramatically this week with the implementation of the Homelessness Act 2002. The principles in this case will still apply, except that councils will now usually need to give reasons for adverse decisions.
No comments yet