Cambridge South station offers a gentler model for growth on the science fringe

CSSA 06-17-034 credit Murphy Group

Source: Murphy Group

Fereday Pollard & Partners’ Cambridge South station tries to make growth feel softer, greener and more connected. Nick Jones travels there to find out if thoughtful infrastructure can reconcile the city’s booming biomedical economy with its housing and transport pressures

regen connect crop

As you approach Cambridge South station from the west, there is no taxi rank or car park. In fact, there is not even a road, just a sand-coloured cycle and footpath that almost immediately bleeds into the surrounding nature reserve. The station itself is all exposed timber and sloping green roofs, which unfurl down into a long tail-like canopy for cycle parking. Its architect suggests that it looks like a station that has been swallowed by a snake.

If this sounds more like the reception for an off-grid campsite than a busy urban commuter hub, that is because Cambridge South is not just about getting people to and from work. It is also trying to negotiate some of the tensions inherent in the city’s rapid expansion.

On the west side of the tracks is greenbelt, with new housing beyond. On the east side sits Europe’s largest biomedical campus, dominated by AstraZeneca’s £1.3bn UK headquarters. Masterplanned by Herzog & de Meuron, the pharma giant’s estate is heralded by the sawtooth facade of the Stirling-nominated Discovery Centre, immediately opposite the station.

Alongside it, a whole avenue of high-quality, if slightly forbidding, science buildings is taking shape: an aluminium-veiled energy and data centre by BDP, the concrete frame of Hawkins\Brown’s Rosalind Franklin megalab, and a plot earmarked for a six-storey office and conference centre by Jestico + Whiles.

Although the masterplan works hard to create a more human, urban feel at street level, it was important for Cambridge South to appear separate from the campus, says Jan Kroes, director at architect Fereday Pollard & Partners. “If the station had simply followed the same architectural language, it risked being drowned out, while also potentially contributing to the urbanisation of the greenbelt fringe. It became clear that we needed to do the opposite.”

tectural language, it risked being drowned out, while also potentially contributing to the urbanisation of the greenbelt fringe. It became clear that we needed to do the opposite.”

Already registered? Login here

To continue enjoying Building.co.uk, sign up for free guest access

Existing subscriber? LOGIN

 

Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.

  • Limited access to building.co.uk
  • Breaking industry news as it happens
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

Get your free guest access  SIGN UP TODAY

Gated access promo

Subscribe now for unlimited access

 

Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:

  • Unlimited access to all stories including expert analysis and comment from industry leaders
  • Our league tables, cost models and economics data
  • Our online archive of over 10,000 articles
  • Building magazine digital editions
  • Building magazine print editions
  • Printed/digital supplements

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

View our subscription options and join our community