Peabody and Notting Hill aim to make up for missing out on preferred partner status

Two high-profile housing associations that missed out on one of 70 lucrative partnership contracts with the Housing Corporation are considering bidding under the government’s new £200m pilot investment programme to pay social housing grant to private developers.

A number of high-performing arm’s-length management organisations also indicated to Housing Today that they are interested in accessing funds via the pilot the corporation hopes will result in 400 to 500 homes.

Housebuilders David Wilson Homes, Taylor Woodrow and Crest Nicholson have also said they would be interested in the scheme after the corporation launched its 20-page consultation on the proposals last Friday.

We are taking it very seriously. We will give serious consideration to putting a substantial portfolio in for the corporation's consideration

Terry Fuller, partnership director, Taylor Woodrow

Ingrid Reynolds, group director of property and new business for Notting Hill – which missed out on a place in the corporation’s elite group of long-term development funding partners after damning inspection reports from the Audit Commission – said: “We will consider seriously competing for grant once we have considered the proposals. Overall, our main reasons for bidding would be to bring forward opportunities that we have now that could be put into the programme. Otherwise we would be bidding in September 2005 at the earliest.”

Michael May, property director at Peabody Trust, which revealed in October it will have to sell up to 1100 homes to raise the £212m it needs to meet the decent homes target by 2010, said: “Partnership with private developers may be a possibility for future projects, opening up schemes for new homes that may otherwise have been difficult to take forward.”

Choice is a good thing. Why not give people more choice of high-quality new properties? It would be wrong not to at least have a look [at the consultation]

Hugh Broadbent, chief executive, First Choice Homes

The £200m pilot – details of which were revealed last month in Housing Today – will be launched in February, with comments on the consultation due by 11 January.

The National Housing Federation has reiterated its concerns over ensuring that the use of accreditation contracts for non-RSLs results in a level playing field between private firms and housing associations.

We welcome this. Partnership with private developers may be a possibility for future projects, opening up schemes for new homes that may otherwise have been difficult to take forward

Michael May, property director, Peabody Trust

Mark Lupton, policy analyst at the Chartered Institute of Housing, said this was the “beginning of the end for housing

associations’ monopoly on managing and maintaining stock”.

Colin Smith, managerial director for Crest Partnership Homes, said: “We will be looking to bid strategically with housing association partners and local authorities.”

The main points of the consultation

  • The programme will launch in February with comments on the consultation due by January 11

  • Bids will be accepted from housing associations and unregistered bodies

  • Funding of unregistered bodies will be based on contracts tied to provision of grant

  • Funding of housing associations is underpinned by the existing regulatory framework

  • Corporation would “strongly prefer” the management responsibilities of the homes produced to rest with RSLs or others with good records of social housing management but “will not rule out” other approaches if they demonstrate cost effectiveness and careful management of risks

  • Corporation plans to introduce an accreditation scheme for all organisations that are to manage homes produced under the pilot programme

  • It will require equivalent standards and outcomes for tenants/residents in construction, design and management of similar homes, whether provided by unregistered bodies or RSLs

  • Primary focus of the programme is on new build

  • ALMOs may consider joining bidding partnership to manage some of the homes produced

  • Investment to be concentrated in a small number of organisations and partnerships – most allocations will be for programmes providing 400 or more units of social and affordable housing

  • Framework contract with developers would include the requirement for corporation consent to the sale or disposal of any homes produced under the programme

  • Programme will look to reflect distribution of resources already agreed with ministers: 44.7% in London, 12% in the South East, 9.4% in the North West and 7.2% in the Eastern region.

Who's interested in bidding?

RSLs

  • Peabody

  • Notting Hill

ALMOs
  • Hounslow Homes

  • CityWest Homes, Westminster

  • Derby Homes

  • First Choice Homes, Oldham

Developers
  • Taylor Woodrow

  • Crest Nicholson

  • David Wilson Homes