The local judge granted a possession order but suspended it for one year on the basis that the threat of eviction for any further nuisance would serve to restrain the tenant and her son.
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal and substituted an outright possession order. The judge had been wrong to think a suspended order would change the behaviour when neither the possession proceedings nor the ASBO had achieved a change. The tenant's threat to neighbours, lack of remorse and failure to set out how she would control her son's behaviour justified her immediate eviction. Any other result would fail to protect the interests of neighbours.
Source
Housing Today
Reference
The structured discretion provisions of the Antisocial Behaviour Act 2003 do not apply to the stage at which a judge is considering whether to make a suspended or an outright order. This case plugs that gap.