The council's practice was to have particulars of claim checked by housing or legal staff, then apply a senior officer's signature by rubber stamp. The senior officer would know nothing about individual cases and would not see the forms or apply the stamp himself.
A district judge decided this did not comply with the rules. The council appealed but the senior designated civil judge dismissed the appeal. He decided the rules required the statement of truth to be made by someone actually verifying the matters contained in the document. That person could "sign" with a rubber stamp of their signature. But as the council was not following this procedure, its cases could not proceed until the rules were complied with.
Source
Housing Today
Reference
Landlords following Birmingham's practice (or a similar one) must now revise procedures in light of this judgment.
No comments yet