In fact, its status as the one of the most ambitious retail makeovers ever seemed assured last month when Selfridges dropped its £300m, Foster-designed redevelopment plans for its flagship Oxford Street site, in favour of a £20m nationwide refurbishment programme.
But why would the John Lewis Partnership commit £107m to an existing asset when they could have purchased several new stores elsewhere for the same amount? Put simply, the building was worth it.
Chelsea residents are some of the richest in the country and since 1900, Peter Jones has been their corner shop. They bought their school uniforms there. They shopped for 21st birthday bashes there. Now it is their children and grandchildren jostling to park the Range Rover. These people dig deep into their Prada handbags, too, so even though footfall is relatively light, Peter Jones's annual turnover, prior to the refurbishment, was second only to Oxford Street's John Lewis.
The symbolic value of Peter Jones is immense as well. Within the John Lewis group it's known as the "Cradle of the Partnership". In 1877 the young Welshman Peter Jones opened his store and began the tradition of treating staff well, providing living accommodation above the shop. John Lewis, of Oxford Street fame, bought him out in 1905. His son Spedan Lewis started profit sharing after he took over the business in 1914. Evidence of the company's early attitude to employees were found when the project team discovered a theatre, squash courts and a swimming pool (empty, of course) upstairs in the old building.
It is also significant architecturally. The facade looks slightly retro now, but the 1930s curving glass and steel frontage was Britain's first example of curtain walling. But by 1995 the cradle of the partnership was showing distinct signs of wear: squeaky floors, carpets sellotaped down, fans blowing everywhere to make up for the lack of air conditioning. "It was like visiting an old auntie's house," said Beverley Aspinall, store managing director, adding that this lived-in atmosphere made the loyal clientele feel at home.
But under the surface it was more serious. The essential services were in a state of decrepitude. Installed in the 1930s the heating, plumbing, wiring and fire sprinkling systems were shot. "We were limping from day to day waiting for the time when we'd have to close," said Aspinall.
'We apologise for the inconvenience...'
Clearly it was time to act. The owner, the John Lewis Partnership, engaged Davis Langdon in 1996 to work up a cost model. They set upon doing the work over five years, keeping at least two thirds of the store open at all times. It was a long, expensive and complex programme on an island site in a busy urban district.
They considered other options, like shutting the store and finishing in half the time. But while that may have been easier for the contractors, it would have meant making 1500 "partners" redundant (that's what John Lewis calls its employees). They also felt that if they shut, they might as well stay shut. Deprived of Peter Jones, these loyal big spenders would have been tempted to find another corner store. "We discounted this option very quickly," said Aspinall.
Having decided to keep the store open, the next question was how open? One early plan involved more than 100 phases, but the scale of the work was so profound that that would have been unworkable. "It was more open-heart surgery than refurbishment," said a spokesman for Bovis, the construction manager.
So they decided on three big phases, which would see a third of the trading space removed at any one time. Even though the John Lewis Partnership used a warehouse in the vicinity for extra retail space, there was a significant drop in revenue throughout the five years, broadly reflecting the amount of floor space rendered unusable.
It was a courageous move for a client, possible only because, as a private firm, the John Lewis Partnership can take a longer view about investing millions. It will need to capitalise on the fact that, apart from getting a building that works and a flashy new interior, Peter Jones has 20% more floor space. Aspinall predicts a full revenue recovery to second place behind John Lewis on Oxford Street.
If the John Lewis Partnership can be credited with a full-blooded embrace of a major construction challenge, so can Beverley Aspinall. She'd been working with the Partnership 10 years when she became MD of Peter Jones, thus inheriting the looming spectre of the refurbishment. Given the choice of directing the project herself or having a more experienced project manager from the Partnership parachuted in, she chose to do it herself. But her first project meeting was a bit of a shock.
"Everybody was a bit macho and aggressive," she said. But soon the two cultures rubbed off on each other. "They became more negotiable and we became less afraid of upsetting people," she said.
For a dedicated retailer (and shopper), Aspinall admits that spending £107m has been the most glorious shopping spree of her life.
Invitation
We thought Peter Jones was good, but do you know of a more ambitious refurb job? Email construction_manager@cmpinformation.comA digest of notable technical challenges
Store MD Beverley Aspinall’s nomination for the biggest headache was the frequent flooding caused by attempts to link the new plumbing into the old system as they progressed from phase to phase. There was a fire, too. “I think my worst fear was that the whole thing would burn down,” she said, although she hinted that before the first phase was finished, lasting two years and costing around £40m, part of her rather hoped the whole thing would burn down, thus making the job simpler. Steel trouble
To raise the roof of the central well Bovis Lend Lease had to punch through a few old floors. To make good they had to attach new, extruded steel beams onto the old ones, installed in the 1930s. So? The old beams were made of multiple plies riveted together, common in the 1930s. Connecting new to old was a delicate procedure. Fortunately the structural engineer, Hurst, Pierce & Malcolm, had been the original consultants when that section was built, and they had the old drawings for extra guidance. Behind the facade
The building grew up in stages since the turn of the last century so, while much of the building’s centre had to be scooped out, a big stretch of an elevation along Symons Street had to be propped up. In some places this skin of masonry was only six inches thick. Bovis erected temporary steel towers on the inside and clamped the facade to these using trusses. They used motion sensors to monitor movement. The most it wavered was 10mm, well within the design tolerance. “It was like working in a canyon 30m deep,” said Gordon Hallewell, a partner with Davis Langdon who has been working on the project since 1996. Peter Lippard, a Bovis project director, said everyone was relieved when the facade’s grip on the new building held. Mind the gap
The first phase involved ripping out the middle of the store. It needed to be done first because, with the central vault and 14 new escalators, it was the new heart of Peter Jones. But it left shoppers marooned at either end of the building. The solution was a covered external walkway above the Kings Road, which Peter Jones was able to disguise with a branded hoarding. Costing the unknown
The most impressive thing is that it came in as close as it did to the projections made in 1999. Why? Because the team couldn’t survey the building thoroughly. They could drill a hole here and there and peek through the odd ceiling aperture, but getting their hands dirty with a proper root around was out of the question in the company of lunching ladies. There were nasty surprises, such as cellars filled with concrete, but the estimates held. Hallewell credits John Lewis, who knew the right questions to ask, Bovis, who managed the risks, and his own team for their sound predictions.
Credits
Cost PlanDavis Langdon
Concept Architect
John McAslan & partners
Structural engineer
Hurst Peirce & Malcolm
Construction Manager
Bovis
Mechnical contractor
Meica
Electrical contractor
T Clarke
Source
Construction Manager
No comments yet