But now, thanks to the determined efforts of housing officers, the teenagers have removed the scrawl from the estate, rechannelled their energies into getting involved in the community and have become positive role models for local kids.
Most local authorities suffer from the social blight of graffiti (see page 27). The problem is most severe in London: concern is so high there that the national government has just backed calls from London councils for a ban on the sale of aerosol paints to under-18s (HT 8 August, page 13).
But that’s not the only way local authorities are tackling the issue. The change in behaviour of Ali and his friends, who live on the Redcoat estate in Tower Hamlets, east London, shows how councils can tackle the root causes of graffiti – boredom and disaffection – rather than simply treat the symptom by cleaning up after the culprits.
Housing manager Imtiyaz Bobat led the work with Redcoat’s teenagers. He says: “Youngsters haven’t got many activities in the summer because of low income and a lack of things to do in the area. That’s when they start doing graffiti.”
Officers on the estate were already building bridges with disaffected youngsters by encouraging team activities like football and table tennis. “Working together to remove graffiti is another way of trying to do this,” says Bobat.
Housing officers tracked down those responsible for the graffiti through their “tags” – unique graffiti signatures.
But instead of immediately punishing the culprits, Bobat and his team asked them why they felt the need to graffiti and urged them to clean it up. Feeling they were being listened to, the teenagers agreed.
“Now these guys have shown they are committed to working with the local community for the benefit of this area,” says Bobat.
Ali and his five friends worked with the housing officers to form their own youth club – the Jubilee Youth Group. In the past four months, membership has grown to 30.
Ali says: “Because there wasn’t much to do, we used to hang around with loads of other kids and people used to classify us as a gang – which we’re not. So in the beginning we started off in a rough spot with the council.
“But once we started working with them we managed to get other lads to follow in our footsteps and we felt that we could achieve something. When other kids saw us achieving things they wanted to do the same.”
The Jubilee Youth Group raises funds by holding jumble sales and members have painted a mural on the themes of friendship and tolerance which will be exhibited at a local library this summer. They also started to attend tenants’ meetings – something that was unthinkable four months before. At the meetings, they talked about the reasons for their behaviour and also helped to build cultural bridges, as many of them are from Asian backgrounds whereas the tenants’ association is predominantly white.
The approach in Tower Hamlets is backed by experts such as Christine Gibbons, coordinator of the voluntary group Children’s and Young People’s Services East Greenwich (CYPSEG), based not far from the Redcoat. Gibbons agrees that tackling the reasons that lead youngsters to graffiti is key to solving the problem. “To me graffiti represents a mini way of being famous,” she says.
“It’s about the fact that they don’t feel that they are part of the community. Graffiti gives them a way to mark their territory and it makes them feel better.”
CYPSEG gets £22,000 of government funding for three years to cover the costs of staffing the organisation and the materials for the projects. The purpose of the organisation is to work with disaffected youngsters who have been excluded from school or been in trouble, and offer them a way of channelling their interests.
Gibbons helped set up an initiative that works with youngsters on Greenwich council’s Flamsteed estate in south-east London. Set up in November 2000, the project lasted 12 months and focused on encouraging young people who would usually write graffiti to use their artistic skills in a project beneficial to the community. By liaising with other residents on the estates and the local police, Gibbons worked with the young people to design a series of murals on the estate walls.
Spending time with youths and finding out what they can achieve when given the chance is what is most important to Gibbons. She says: “One of the things that the graffiti project proved was that once people stop stereotyping these children, they realise that they are normal.”
Clearing up around the UK
Graffiti is not just a London problem, nor does it just affect estates. In Sheffield the “street force” team, responsible for cleaning graffiti, has got local businesses on board in the fight against the problem. According to the agreement, organisations should agree to remove obscenities and racist graffiti within 24 hours of it being brought to their attention. Other graffiti must be removed within 10 days. The police are acting as a partner for the charter and will take action to ensure graffiti vandalism is reduced and offenders prosecuted. “Grimebusters” is Manchester city council’s drive to crack down on graffiti and flyposting. The campaign involves council officers collecting evidence as well as cleaning up after the taggers so it is easier to prosecute the culprits. The project is part of an overall drive to clean up the city. In Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, the council set up a graffiti removal scheme in 2002 after pressure from residents. It uses contractors to do the cleaning but the council hopes to run schemes that directly involve youngsters in the future. The council also hopes to employ an education officer with the specific remit of working with schools to spread the anti-graffiti message. Public transport facilities are the other main victims of graffiti damage. Railtrack spent £600,000 last year to get rid of graffiti from stations in the south of England, while South-eastern transport companies have spent £6.2m in total.Counting the cost
Local authorities bear the brunt of the bill for graffiti. Legally, councils have the power to demand that a business clean up graffiti, but cannot seek compensation if the council ends up having to do the work.- London councils spend £13m each year cleaning up graffiti and have spent £100m in total
- In Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, the council’s graffiti removal scheme has cost £200,000 since 2001
- Councillors in Sheffied say ridding the city of graffiti would cost £2.5m
Source
Housing Today
No comments yet