- News
All the latest updates on building safety reformRegulations latest
- Focus
All the latest updates on building safety reform
By Chi Mount 2021-11-08T08:44:00
As the series moves onto the topic of defects, Chi Mount explains the differences between a reasonable skill and care obligation and a fitness for purpose obligation
Contractors and consultants are required to exercise a degree of care in the performance of their works and services. This might be an express contractual duty or, in the absence of such express provision, an implied duty. There are generally two standards of care: a duty to use reasonable skill and care, and a fitness for purpose obligation.
Professional designers are under a duty to act with reasonable skill and care. This duty arises by virtue of section 13 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, unless there is an express provision to the contrary in their terms of engagement. As a consultant is a professional person, the common law of negligence dictates they must use the level of skill and care to be expected of a reasonably competent member of the same profession, not just that expected of the average person.
Read more …
Existing subscriber? LOGIN
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.
Get your free guest access SIGN UP TODAY
Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:
View our subscription options and join our community