This was an appeal by the Grafton Group trading as Plumbase, the Part 20 defendant, against an order finding that Plumbase was negligent in respect of an accident at work sustained by the claimant Andrew Smith, a delivery-man employed by Plumbase. Smith had injured himself when a plank gave way while carrying radiators over a walkway.

In the proceedings Smith claimed damages for personal injuries sustained while working at a building site occupied by S Notaro Ltd, the defendant and Part 20 Claimant. Notaro joined Plumbase as Part 20 defendant. The recorder found all three parties to blame for the accident.

He found Notaro to be in breach of a duty owed to the claimant under Regulation 5(1) of the Construction (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996, namely a duty to provide, so far as reasonably practicable, a suitable and safe access and egress to and from every place of work. He found the claimant, Mr Smith, guilty of contributory negligence to the extent of 60%. He further found that the Part 20 claim by Notaro against Plumbase succeeded on the basis that, in failing to give Smith any formal training in the avoiding of risks of handling goods, Plumbase was in breach of a statutory duty owed to him under Regulation 4(1) of the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992.

The recorder apportioned liability one thirds to Notaro and two thirds to Plumbase. Accordingly Plumbase was ordered to contribute £10,656 to Notaro’s liability of £16,000.

The issue was whether Plumbase was liable to make any contribution to Notaro’s liability, and if so whether the apportionment was too great.

Plumbase conceded that it was in breach of the Manual Handling Operations Regulations but submitted that it was a technical breach that did not cause Mr Smith’s accident.