- News

All the latest updates on building safety reformRegulations latest
- Focus

All the latest updates on building safety reform
By Will Arnold 2026-10-22T14:46:00
The draft London Plan’s decision to cap upfront embodied carbon rather than set a single whole life limit has divided opinion. Will Arnold argues the GLA has the logic exactly right
The draft London Plan sets numerical limits on upfront embodied carbon, and requires whole life carbon to be calculated and reported. Some have asked why the limit sits on upfront embodied carbon rather than whole life carbon.
But I think the Greater London Authority has got it right: a single whole life number cannot tell us what is driving a building’s emissions, when those emissions happen, or whether we can even trust that prediction in the first place.
Use the estimates we can verify
Planning decisions are based on carbon estimates, so reliability really matters. Upfront carbon calculations come from material quantities, product-specific environmental product declarations (EPDs) and supply chain data. They are still just predictions – but as we build, we learn and we improve.
London has required whole life carbon reporting for five years, which means there are projects that went through planning recently and are now on-site or finished. We can see where the upfront estimates held and where they did not, and feed that into the next round of policymaking and calculation standard. That feedback loop is why our estimates keep getting better.
Existing subscriber? LOGIN
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.
Get your free guest access SIGN UP TODAY

Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:
View our subscription options and join our community