It's a tale of two city watersides for Lord Heseltine - but whereas one was reborn in an urban renaissance and the other is drowning in mediocrity

There are many candidates for my wonder: my own home would top any list but if it's one that's in the public domain, it would have to be the Albert Dock, Liverpool. I arrived as environment secretary in 1979, just ahead of the bulldozers, and one of my first acts was to make sure that building was not destroyed.

It symbolises the rebirth of a great city and it is a spectacular piece of architecture. It went on to play a symbolic role in the urban renaissance the Conservatives created in the 1980s and 1990s.


Resurgent
Resurgent

The Albert Dock was designed by engineer and architect Jesse Hartley, and opened by Prince Albert on 30 July 1846. It was closed in 1972 for refurbishment by Arrowcroft Group. The first phase was reopened in 1984 and the official reopening by Prince Charles took place on 24 May 1988. The insurance valuation of the buildings is £250m.


My blunder is the development of the South Bank of the Thames. This was one of the great potential waterscapes of the urban world and the way we developed it after 1945 is shameful. Considering how much of the South Bank was rebuilt, the quality of the architecture is dismaying. I hope someone else will have a go. I was so appalled that I worked with officials in 1971-72 to create an urban development corporation on the South Bank. I was then promoted to aerospace minister and the plans fell into abeyance until I returned to the department in 1979, when I adapted them to the crying needs of the East End of London.


Dismaying
Dismaying

Efforts in the 1970s and 1980s to give the South Bank a facelift were thwarted by local community groups. Prince Charles once likened it to a “nuclear power station”.