More Comment – Page 664

  • Comment

    A 51st viewpoint

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    I was interested to read your article “Construction: No place for women!” (10 June, page 28). Unlike the 50 women who were interviewed on Oxford Street, when I was 16 I became an apprentice for a local authority as a painter and decorator. I met very little resistance from male ...

  • Tony Bingham
    Comment

    Asking for it

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    If you lose an adjudication to an opponent in poor financial health, can you decline to pay up? Happily, the courts have just laid down clear rules on this

  • Comment

    Bad news from the World Bank

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    The second edition of the FIDIC standard form shows signs of having been bent in favour of the World Bank – to the detriment of its international contracting community

  • Comment

    After Kyoto

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    The European Union is looking to cut 40% of carbon emissions from buildings, but it hasn’t decided exactly how. So, now’s your chance to influence the debate …

  • Comment

    Who’s suing whom

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    A round-up of writs in the Technology and Construction Court

  • Comment

    Pastry problems

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    This was an appeal from the decision of judge Seymour on 21 April 2004 in which he dismissed Filobake’s claim again Rondo and awarded nominal damages against Frampton.Filobake was a manufacturer of filo pastry and wished to extend its product range into samosa pastry. Rondo specialised in the manufacture and ...

  • Comment

    Such a waste

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    In terms of amount of work, construction is performing well – but look at the all-important productivity data and it’s clear resources are still being managed inefficiently

  • Comment

    Back issues

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    It was agreed there was no code of practice for industrialised buildings …

  • Gus Alexander
    Comment

    Being Frank

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    Frank Lloyd Wright’s extraordinary Fallingwater is an object lesson for all architects in how to get the client to want what you want them to want

  • Hansom
    Comment

    Hansom

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    This week, Jude Law makes his debut on the construction stage, Lord Foster finds his true vocation and the chancellor has to relearn the alphabet

  • Comment

    How to serve schools

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    What a feast has been laid out for the building industry by Tony Blair’s government.

  • Comment

    Wriggle room

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    A developer tried three arguments to get round an adjudicator’s order to pay its contractor £170k. This is what the court said about them

  • Comment

    Here’s an idea …

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    Third-party rights have failed to dispose of collateral warranties. But maybe they could still do so – and eliminate the hated net contribution clause into the bargain

  • Comment

    Can I have some more?

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    Many PFI contracts are about to reach their first price review, when the contractor can apply for more money. This is likely to lead to some old friends falling out

  • Comment

    The perils of progress

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    So it turns out that the residents of one block of flats at the Greenwich Millennium Village are occasionally forced to sleep on a friend’s floor to escape noise transmission from their neighbour’s flat (6 May, page 26).

  • Comment

    An adviser advises

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    With reference to Colin Harding’s comments on the CSCS scheme (10 June, page 36), I am a health and safety adviser in the construction industry and have attained a nationally recognised qualification through the National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health.

  • Comment

    Colin’s utopia realised

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    So Colin Harding (17 June, page 35) proposes a new “all-inclusive contract” linking design consultants and supervisors through a single agreement that defines their individual and collective responsibilities, and expands also to include constructors, specialists and subcontractors.

  • Comment

    Easy as JCT

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    The new suites of JCT contracts are rolling off the presses, the ink is barely dry and already Helen Garthwaite (24 June, page 58) is wanting to amend the forms.

  • Comment

    Plugging the gaps

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    Building relatively airtight dwellings is not rocket science (Letters, 17 June, page 36).

  • Comment

    An unfortunate accuracy

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    Your news feature “Construction: No place for women!” (10 June, page 28) may have been harking back to a 1950s spoof, but the virtual construction piece in the same issue (page 58) was bang up-to-date.