Opinion – Page 604

  • Comment

    No free lunches

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    Tony Bingham Lost an adjudication? Don't want to pay the adjudicator's fee? Tough. Pay up or risk getting sued – and if you are, you may well end up paying those costs, too

  • Comment

    Who pays for plan B?

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    Changing the design that was given planning permission can lead to additional costs, so check that the contract makes it clear which pary is taking on that risk

  • Comment

    Anything you say …

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    Judges want the parties to a quarrel to sort it out themselves. Here's how they've been getting this across to those who've had the temerity to bother the courts

  • Comment

    An impossible job

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    Peter Rogers' comments seem to be an extension of the debate held within each profession, where the absence of holistic knowledge of every other discipline is lamented.

  • Comment

    Stick with it

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    I couldn't agree more with Peter Rogers (4 July, page 11).

  • Comment

    Point taken, but …

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    I would like to thank Mr Merricks for taking the trouble to reply to my column (27 June, page 34).

  • Comment

    We're still learning

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    In response to the claim that project managers are not adequately trained (4 July, page 11), I would like to point out that the RICS has created the Project Management Faculty as part of its Agenda for Change.

  • Comment

    Margins schmargins

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    The writer of No leftovers (18 July, page 30) appears to be confused in comparing the margins in contracting with the margins obtained in the manufacturing industry.

  • Comment

    A fan of John Prescott

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    Our Romanian carpenter was overjoyed to get a mention in letters (What do you expect?, 11 July, page 32) and has taken to reading Building on a regular basis.

  • Comment

    A catch-25 situation

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    My work requires me to inspect commercial and industrial buildings, and to arrange for their maintenance.

  • Comment

    Problems can and will happen

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    The article "Whatever happened to Peabody's prefab?" (18 July, page 15) said that high winds and proximity to railway lines contributed to the delayed completion. This is not true.

  • Comment

    What we're all about

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    What distinguished professionals from tradesmen was their assumption of social superiority backed up by guaranteed fee rates. Now those have gone, what's left?

  • Comment

    Not much to look forward to

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    Last year a Building/Hays Montrose survey found that more than half of the magazine's readers were worried about their pensions. And they were right to be concerned.

  • Comment

    Reveal all before you decide

    2003-08-01T00:00:00Z

    Stansell was a building contractor carrying out work in Union Street, Bristol. It engaged RSL as a subcontractor. The subcontract was based on the Standard Form of Domestic Sub-contract DOM/2 1981 edition (reprinted in 1998) incorporating amendments 1-8. Clause 38 contained adjudication provisions. A dispute arose in ...

  • Comment

    Making plans for Nigel

    2003-07-25T00:00:00Z

    Small, efficient firms are being squeezed out by a government that is hand-in-glove with big construction. So, here are some suggestions for our new minister

  • Comment

    Logic of the madhouse

    2003-07-25T00:00:00Z

    The government is trying to improve housing supply by making housebuilders' job so onerous that they would rather build their homes in China than Chingford

  • Comment

    Hansom

    2003-07-25T00:00:00Z

    This week, an expert panel gets the silent treatment, pallid architects get a roasting and Simon Thurley makes the bed he has to lie on

  • Comment

    Being sat on by a hippo

    2003-07-25T00:00:00Z

    Memo to Nigel Griffiths: More and more small, solvent firms are being squashed by large, insolvent ones. At present they have almost no protection. Time to step in?

  • Comment

    No sex please

    2003-07-25T00:00:00Z

    In their enthusiasm to make their case, disputants are likely to ‘sex up’ evidence. But good adjudicators, and good prime ministers, ought to be immune to spin

  • Comment

    After the fall

    2003-07-25T00:00:00Z

    In the absence of a conventional government in Iraq, what is the legal status of contracts signed with state bodies? And how about those signed with Saddam's regime?