Opinion – Page 635

  • Comment

    The claimant strikes back

    2002-04-26T00:00:00Z

    A judge may not like it when a party fails to comply with a court order, but they should think twice before striking out the claim altogether

  • Comment

    An offer you can't refuse

    2002-04-26T00:00:00Z

    Is mediation now mandatory? Well, parties that refuse an offer to mediate without good reason may find they lose out on costs even when they they win the case

  • Comment

    Poor Superman

    2002-04-19T00:00:00Z

    Referees are supposed to be the superheroes in construction disputes. Now they're just as likely to be cast as persecutor – before turning into victim

  • Comment

    Suit yourself

    2002-04-19T00:00:00Z

    You don't have to go bespoke to get a contract that suits. A nip here, a cut-and-paste clause there, can keep everyone happy. Just be careful with the scissors

  • Comment

    Built on sand?

    2002-04-19T00:00:00Z

    Poor housebuilders. For nearly a decade, they've given the City what they thought it always wanted – year-on-year growth in profits and, latterly, double-digit margins. The response from the Square Mile? Utter indifference. The sector is rated at less than half the stock exchange average. Even contractors, with their 2%-if-you're-lucky ...

  • Comment

    Hansom

    2002-04-19T00:00:00Z

    Shock horror as Brumwell takes on Big Ron, CABE is besieged by women, Foster names his RIBA favourite and Tony Douglas tries to play Mr Nice Guy

  • Comment

    IT is not the answer

    2002-04-19T00:00:00Z

    We all know IT will mobilise construction, giving everyone a faster, better service – and we are all wrong. In fact, like any tool, it's only as good as those who use it

  • Comment

    Events, dear boy, events

    2002-04-19T00:00:00Z

    Life has a way of blowing a hole in a construction programme, but if a draft delay protocol is adopted, contractors will need to get it right from the start.

  • Comment

    Within reasons

    2002-04-12T00:00:00Z

    If an adjudicator's decision is made up of several conclusions, do those all count as binding decisions as well, or are they reasons? It's a pretty thorny question

  • Comment

    Can adjudicators add interest?

    2002-04-12T00:00:00Z

    According to John Redmond, an adjudicator cannot add interest to a debt unless the contract specifically allows them to. But there's a counter argument to be put …

  • Comment

    Labour's philosophical fog

    2002-04-12T00:00:00Z

    So, health minister John Hutton has suddenly realised what construction knew months ago: it is already too late to deliver his new hospitals before the next election. His offer to subsidise bids, truncate tender lists and hire more Whitehall project managers has, therefore, the hallmarks of political panic (pages 28-29). ...

  • Comment

    Hansom

    2002-04-12T00:00:00Z

    This week: the Treasury gets radical, Philip Cleaver gets tough, the Conservatives get mopy, photocopying gets expensive and BAA gets weird

  • Comment

    Be braver

    2002-04-12T00:00:00Z

    Britain's proud reputation for cutting edge design is in danger of being stifled by an increasingly risk-averse society and pressure from the insurance giants

  • Comment

    A question of … timing

    2002-04-12T00:00:00Z

    If you owe me money, and I owe you money, does it make sense to just pay the difference? Let's see how two barristers and a judge sort out this tricky problem …

  • Comment

    Stuck to your guns?

    2002-04-12T00:00:00Z

    After you start an adjudication, can you introduce new arguments or fresh evidence? A recent decision suggests not, but clarification is needed urgently

  • Comment

    The loves of Lady Justice

    2002-04-05T00:00:00Z

    The goddess of justice had a soft spot for consultants, and tended to take their side in tort cases. Now it seems she's found a significant other …

  • Comment

    Indecent proposals

    2002-04-05T00:00:00Z

    This is a story about a householder who agreed to pay a dodgy builder cash, then tried to kick him in his assets when things went wrong. What did the judge say?

  • Comment

    Houses, not circuses

    2002-04-05T00:00:00Z

    If 1.7 million homes are 'not decent', that means that something like the entire population of London is living in squalor. What on earth can we do?

  • Comment

    Hansom

    2002-04-05T00:00:00Z

    This week: find out who's tipped for Egan's job, deal with demonic possession, cover yourself in olive oil and make crime pay …

  • Comment

    Blind man's bluff

    2002-04-05T00:00:00Z

    The government's response to Britain's chronic housing shortage isn't so much bad as nonexistent. Falconer is just pretending nothing is wrong