Get your clause into it – contractual responsibility for specific risks

Tony bingham 2017 bw web

Tony Bingham on a case concerning contractual responsibility for specific risks, and the attempts to locate that amid amendments

I have never been to Stockport; or if I have, I missed it on my way to Manchester. And if I don’t go soon, it will have disappeared by way of a £1bn transformation of the town centre and oodles more millions on thousands of new homes all around. It is 130 acres of development. It needs folk such as John Sisk & Son (Sisk) to cope with the odds.

Capital & Centric (Rose) Ltd (Capital) is developing £60m-worth at the Weir Mill district of the town with Sisk as the main contractor. Some of the buildings being converted go back to the 1700s, and Sisk spotted a snag. Mind you, so did Capital. This led to an adjudication, then the High Court. Not good for public relations.

Weir Mill is all about age-old satanic mills. Some decrepit. The idea in this part of the resurrection of Stockport is to restore the mill buildings and erect two new-build blocks to give 250 “design-led” apartments. Sisk is ideal for this sort of adventure.

This content is available to REGISTERED users

You are not currently logged in.

LOGIN or REGISTER to access this story

Gated access promo

LOGIN or REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts.

Take out a print and online or online only subscription and you will get immediate access to:

  • Breaking industry news as it happens
  • Expert analysis and comment from industry leaders
  • Unlimited access to all stories, including premium content
  • Full access to all our online archive

Get access to premium content subscribe today