Opinion – Page 586

  • Comment

    May we just say …

    2004-03-05T00:00:00Z

    Some people are unlikely to have been impressed by Marc Hanson's article in your legal section, "Keep taking the supplements" (30 January 2004, page 48).

  • Comment

    Aww, shucks

    2004-03-05T00:00:00Z

    I have wanted for some time now to express my appreciation of Building magazine.

  • Comment

    RICS' student lethargy

    2004-03-05T00:00:00Z

    Once more Building has hit a topical nail on the head ("You'll pay for this", 23 January, page 3)

  • Comment

    Don't do down planners

    2004-03-05T00:00:00Z

    Your cover story "Planning - a world where nothing works" (20 February) misses the point on how and why we need to reform the system.

  • Comment

    What are we here for?

    2004-03-05T00:00:00Z

    A reader writes As QSs already have at least four professional bodies they can be members of, why do they need another? We explain what the QSi has to offer

  • Comment

    Trickey's situations

    2004-03-05T00:00:00Z

    Doh!

  • Comment

    Record time

    2004-03-05T00:00:00Z

    Following the outbreak of foot and mouth disease in 2001, JDM entered into a contract with DEFRA to construct burial sites and infrastructure works. Under the contract, JDM was to be paid a reasonable rate for such labour and materials as it provided. JDM produced timesheets to back up its ...

  • Comment

    The NEC: A user's guide

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    Changing a partnering contract isn't like changing a brand of cereal – but the contract writers could take a lesson in clear English from the back of the packet

  • Comment

    Private prejudice

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    You may be aware of the extraordinary case of CWS vs ICL, and if so, you probably have one overriding question: what on earth was going on in the judge's mind?

  • Comment

    All the difference

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    It doesn't just make you feel all warm and gooey – a bit of gratitude is worth as much as hard cash if it helps you with marketing, productivity, legal disputes, morale …

  • Comment

    Hansom

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, dear reader – and if you don't believe me, read these items …

  • Comment

    Spreading the risk

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    If you are thinking of joint venturing with another contractor on a project, make sure you avoid joint liabilities if the other party suddenly goes belly-up

  • Comment

    Wonders & blunders

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    Mike Driver bends a reverential knee to a Finnish church but makes the sign of the cross before a north London office block …

  • Comment

    You've been warned

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    Your article "Click to Survive" (30 January, page 36) was thought-provoking and timely.

  • Comment

    Marking your cards

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    George Brumwell’s hopes of saving lives by registering all foreign workers with the CSCS card scheme (13 February, page 14) is flawed.

  • Comment

    Quantum theory

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    Oh dear! John Redmond has missed the point again (19 December, page 45).

  • Comment

    No excuses

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    Your lead news article on 6 February, "Multiplex warned 'safety is a serious concern with PC Harrington'" highlights just how far we have to go.

  • Comment

    Legalaid

    2004-02-27T00:00:00Z

    This month, our legal experts delve into the mysteries of the NEC standard form, early warning and compensation, and look at whether you can sue a local authority that doesn't give you the job even though you entered the lowest bid

  • Comment

    Guarding your patch

    2004-02-26T00:00:00Z

    I can imagine how some of our readers will react to this month’s cover feature on the move by commercial developers into the residential sector. Some housebuilders will be outraged at the sheer brass neck of the Lipton family and their suggestion that housebuilding is so inefficient that it will ...

  • Comment

    Exceptions rule

    2004-02-20T00:00:00Z

    No, no, of course insurers don't try anything to avoid paying out on an all-risks policy. Still, just to be sure, apply a magnifying glass to that small print …