The roof is the most spectacular part of Foster and Partners’ competition-winning scheme to create a cavernous open space at the heart of the museum. A fine lattice of steel and glass spans the void between the classical facades of the buildings forming the courtyard’s perimeter and the museum’s famous circular Reading Room close to its centre. Its elegant sculptural form is a permanent memorial to the complex engineering design and precise construction work that have made it possible. Twenty-seven months into the project, its true magnificence is only now being revealed as the forest of scaffolding supporting the temporary deck from which the roof was constructed is slowly and carefully removed.
“The scaffold deck was key to the scheme’s success,” says Carl Wright, project director of construction manager Mace. “We had to get it right. And not just the scaffolding. We also had to take note of other work to be carried out and allow for the operation of a tower crane and hoists.”
The 20 m high construction platform had to be strong enough to support the weight of the 800 tonne roof as well as the contractors assembling it. The platform also had to allow stonemasons access to the listed facades of the buildings fronting the square, which they were painstakingly restoring, and allow the contractor to erect new exterior walls to clad the Reading Room. It had to be fashioned in such a way as to maintain circulation routes amid the maze of scaffolding. “It also had to keep the weather out,” says Wright.
Only after the scaffold deck was in place could work begin on installing the high-tech roof. The roof is formed by radial elements spanning between the central Reading Room and the courtyard buildings, interconnected by two opposing spirals to form a steel shell into which more than 3300 glazing panels fit. Six thousand steel sections, each one different and manufactured to precise tolerances, have been used to construct the shell.
The steelwork sections were fabricated at steelwork contractor Waagner-Biró’s base in Austria using a computer-controlled cutting machine commissioned specifically for the project. “To minimise the risk of weld failure, grade D steel, more often used for marine or petrochemical applications, was used for the roof,” says Stephen Brown, a partner in structural engineer Buro Happold. The sections of steel were then shipped to B&K Fabrications in Derby where they were assembled on jigs into a series of ladder trusses up to 10 m in length, before being delivered to site.
With the public still visiting the museum, the trusses had to be craned into the square by lifting them high over the roof of the main entrance. Each section of truss was then carefully supported on temporary props positioned on the deck high above the courtyard. A total of 593 props were used to support the roof during construction. Their positioning was critical for the roof to be assembled accurately, so their locations were precisely defined in three dimensions from the designer’s CAD drawings and carefully set out on site.
On site, the first task for Waagner-Biró was to assemble the 10 m sections of ladder truss into lengths long enough to span the area between the four sides of the courtyard and the Reading Room. The contractor positioned the ladder sections alternately around the perimeter of the Reading Room and then carefully fitted and welded the cross members individually between nodes on the trusses to form the steel shell that would support the glass. “It was a precise operation,” says Brown. The props stood on the scaffold deck, in turn supported on a new concrete floor slab which spanned the new theatre being built in the basement. Almost 500 tonnes of steel make up the roof structure, and as the weight of steelwork increased, the deck and the structure carrying it deflected. “The position of each node had to be monitored constantly during the frame’s construction,” Brown explains, “and every couple of days or so the props had to be adjusted to push the steel back into its exact location.” It was a testing time for Waagner-Biró: the tolerance between each structural node was just 3 mm, and one mistake fitting a cross member could throw the whole roof out of alignment, causing it to fail. In all, 152 ladder trusses were installed. Once the structure was complete, the steel was painted and glass installation commenced.
The roof contains 3312 faceted double-glazed panels, each of them a unique triangle. Each unit is formed from a 12 mm toughened outer panel and 12 mm laminated inner panel, separated by a 16 mm cavity. The glass is screenprinted with small dots covering 56% of its surface area, to filter ultraviolet radiation and reduce solar gain – a technique called “fritting”. The units were fitted from the outside.
With the glazing installed, the roof weighed about 800 tonnes, all of which was carried by the temporary props, in turn supported by the scaffold platform. Before the platform could be dismantled, the props had to be carefully lowered until the roof sank gently onto its final resting place on the facades surrounding the square. “The de-propping sequence was agreed by Buro Happold and Waagner-Biró. We had to make four sweeps around the 593 props, lowering each a fraction at a time,” says Wright. “All the time the roof was being monitored to check that it was performing as the engineers had predicted.” In the end, the roof dropped 150 mm and spread 90 mm laterally as it settled. “This was less than the engineers had predicted,” says Wright, who was clearly relieved.
Avoiding a knock-on effect
Some of the most difficult work on the project was emptying the courtyard to prepare for the installation of the scaffold so that work could begin on the roof. Mace was fortunate in having been appointed in October 1996, 15 months before construction was due to start. “There was a good amount of time to analyse, plan and programme the works,” says Wright. “It allowed us to consider where problems might occur and to formulate solutions,” he adds.
A major concern was with the works that affect the existing buildings. Long before construction began, Mace instigated a series of investigations into areas such as the snow gallery circling the roof of the Reading Room that was soon to be punctured by smoke ventilation ductwork for the courtyard. The Reading Room’s foundations were another area probed in preparation for excavation of a new lecture theatre beneath the floor of the Great Court. Some of the stonework forming the facades surrounding the courtyard was also removed to find out how the stone was keyed in and how the facades were constructed.
In addition to investigating how the existing buildings had been put together, Mace carried out tests to see how demolishing the hodgepodge of buildings filling the courtyard would affect the surrounding galleries and Reading Room. Noise and vibration tests were carried out by dropping weights on the floors of the corridors next to the galleries. The walls are more than 1 m thick: “They are so massive not a lot came through,” says Wright.
Because the museum would still be open to the public throughout the project, Mace used the lead-in time to install temporary partitions to separate the public from the site. To keep construction noise out of the public galleries, the windows overlooking the courtyard were boarded out and acoustic insulation was fitted. As an additional precaution, all exhibits were removed from the gallery walls fronting the square.
Mace also used the lull before the project started to appoint the specialist contractors for the scheme, including the roofing contractor, the stonemason, the demolition contractor and the mechanical and electrical contractors.
In March 1998, demolition of the redundant buildings in the courtyard started. “It was a massive demolition inside a grade I-listed space,” says Wright. Only the Reading Room was to be retained. With the courtyard packed so full of buildings, hand breakers had to be used to start the demolition before small mechanical breakers or “bobcats” could be squeezed in. Even then
it was a slow and methodical task. “All rubble had to be skipped out over the roof using the tower crane or driven out by dumpers along the west and north basement passageways,” Wright explains.
Once enough space had been cleared, larger demolition plant could be used. “We used little machines until we could get in some decent gear,” says Wright. “After we had craned in a couple of 35 tonne machines and a 25-tonner, we were able to tear through the remaining buildings with peckers, jaws and grabs. With the works confined to such a small space, the noise was incredible.”
Wright adds, smiling: “It was a bit of a gobsmacker for the museum too. They had never been that close to a construction site before.”
Rising from the ruins
As the demolition progressed, the drum-shaped central Reading Room seemed to rise up from among the remains of the buildings that had previously crammed the courtyard around it.
“The Reading Room is one of the most sensitive buildings in the country and we’ve been knocking seven barrels out of all of the buildings attached to it,” says Wright. As soon as the Reading Room was exposed, work began on underpinning it in preparation for the installation of the new roof.
With the peckers and jaws making short work of the remaining buildings littering the courtyard, it was not long before the facades of the buildings surrounding the courtyard were also revealed. Work on their restoration began immediately, running parallel with the demolition. As soon as the courtyard was cleared, excavation began in preparation for work on the new theatre to be constructed beneath the courtyard floor. Meanwhile, inside the Reading Room, the delicate work of restoring the listed ceiling was under way.
“The key piece of structure to be built in the courtyard was the concrete ground-floor slab,” Wright says. “Once this was done, we could put in the scaffold platform and begin work on the roof.”
Even with the courtyard filled by a forest of scaffolding and installation of the roof under way from the elevated platform, work continued on other parts of the project. The stonemasons were reinstating the original portico to the front hall that had been demolished in the 1870s to make way for an extension. A wall was erected to clothe the naked facade of the Reading Room. A new concrete structure was erected that wraps around the north side of the Reading Room to create a café and retail space for the museum.
With less than six months left before the restored Great Court opens to the public, the final construction phase is now in progress. In the rooms below, the courtyard’s new floor fit-out is under way; the ceiling of the Reading Room has been restored to its original glory, and the Great Court itself is about to be returned to the museum as the largest covered public square in Europe, 150 years after it was originally completed.
Although in many respects this is a restoration project, the original Great Court enjoyed only a brief life as a public square, since almost immediately after Sir Robert Smirke completed it in 1852, it was taken over by the museum’s rapidly expanding library collection. With the roof now complete and the final sections of the access platform being dismantled, Smirke’s Great Court is about to be rediscovered as the public space it was always intended to be.
client British Museum Development Trust project manager British Museum architect Foster and Partners structural & services engineer Buro Happold fire engineer Buro Happold (FEDRA) planning supervisor Buro Happold cost consultant Northcroft construction manager Mace access consultant All Clear Designs
On Site: Great Court, British Museum
- Currently reading