All Letters articles – Page 86

  • Comment

    An open letter to Alun Michael

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    Dear Mr Michael … construction forms, I believe, one of your many minor portfolios, even though it forms the largest industry in the UK. I know you have much to consider, but I would like to offer you some simple advice.

  • Comment

    Waste in the chain

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    The headline “Prescott targets suppliers in drive to cut housing costs” (10 June, page 24) is unfortunate, and at odds with the article itself.

  • Comment

    The path to follow

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    The “Pathfinder” demolition programme that you describe (24 June, page 44) sounds just like it was in the 1960s: lots of slum clearance and, to follow, system buildings.

  • Comment

    Know thyself …

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    Re: Do you recognise these people (24 June, page 41)? Yes, I am one of them!It’s the Fitzroy Robinson Partnership class of 1988 – this photograph accompanied an article in Building on 5 February 1988 called “Fresh Visions”.On the left is Kevin Dash, 65, who left FRP in 1991 and ...

  • Comment

    No need to panic

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    Further to your article regarding the proposed closure of the mastic asphalt course at Manchester School of Construction at Manchester College of Arts and Technology (27 May, page 13), we hope we can attempt to set the record straight with regard to the joint efforts that are taking place between ...

  • Comment

    … Ummm, not quite

    2005-07-08T00:00:00Z

    Do I recognise these people? Yes. They are undoubtably the Fantastic Four – pre-cosmic radiation exposure. On the left is Reed Richards – Mr Fantastic; next to him is Ben Grimm - The Thing; and to the right are Susan and Johnny Storm – the Invisible Woman and the Human ...

  • Comment

    An unfortunate accuracy

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    Your news feature “Construction: No place for women!” (10 June, page 28) may have been harking back to a 1950s spoof, but the virtual construction piece in the same issue (page 58) was bang up-to-date.

  • Comment

    An adviser advises

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    With reference to Colin Harding’s comments on the CSCS scheme (10 June, page 36), I am a health and safety adviser in the construction industry and have attained a nationally recognised qualification through the National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health.

  • Comment

    Colin’s utopia realised

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    So Colin Harding (17 June, page 35) proposes a new “all-inclusive contract” linking design consultants and supervisors through a single agreement that defines their individual and collective responsibilities, and expands also to include constructors, specialists and subcontractors.

  • Comment

    Easy as JCT

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    The new suites of JCT contracts are rolling off the presses, the ink is barely dry and already Helen Garthwaite (24 June, page 58) is wanting to amend the forms.

  • Comment

    Plugging the gaps

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    Building relatively airtight dwellings is not rocket science (Letters, 17 June, page 36).

  • Comment

    The parent trap

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    Over recent years many people have criticised the construction industry for not making enough of an effort to attract women recruits.

  • Comment

    The perils of progress

    2005-07-01T00:00:00Z

    So it turns out that the residents of one block of flats at the Greenwich Millennium Village are occasionally forced to sleep on a friend’s floor to escape noise transmission from their neighbour’s flat (6 May, page 26).

  • Comment

    Speedy 3D …

    2005-06-24T00:00:00Z

    Your article on the use of building models by contractors (10 June, pages 58-59) focuses on very large projects and organisations with professional clients and a large commitment of resources up front.

  • Comment

    And the award for most detailed answer goes to …

    2005-06-24T00:00:00Z

    The picture on 10 June is Ove Arup.

  • Comment

    … in defence of architects

    2005-06-24T00:00:00Z

    Ian Abley seems to be in denial about the responsibilities of designers for site safety.

  • Comment

    Carrot health scare

    2005-06-24T00:00:00Z

    Carrots may be good for you, as Roger Knowles suggests in his letter (3 June, page 36), but the idea of giving a bonus for a reduction in accidents has been tried in the offshore oil industry, with unfortunate results.

  • Comment

    Nails, but no claws

    2005-06-24T00:00:00Z

    It’s good to see Building espousing the cause for more women in construction but sadly the hammer-wielding lady on your front cover isn’t properly equipped for the job.

  • Comment

    Turn the mike down …

    2005-06-24T00:00:00Z

    Perhaps Ian Abley was simply trying to be provocative in his Open Mike article (10 June, page 34) but it is rather alarming that any professional designer should express such views. There is much to take issue with in his article but I will settle for the following.

  • Comment

    Get out of the office

    2005-06-24T00:00:00Z

    As a woman involved in and passionate about a career in construction, I read with interest the article regarding the construction industry being “no place for women” (10 June, page 28).