BRE experts failed to clarify confusing building regs, Grenfell Inquiry told

Grenfell Tower wrapped

Source: Shutterstock.com

Sarah Colwell ignored industry group’s attempts to chase the matter for 16 months

A Building Research Establishment (BRE) expert failed to clarify confusing building regulations which appeared to permit the use of combustible cladding on tall buildings because she believed the guidance would be revised, the Grenfell Inquiry has heard.

An ambiguous passage in Approved Document B, the part of building regulations which deals with fire safety, said that only ‘filler’ materials in cladding systems were required to meet the standard of ‘limited combustibility’.

Already registered? Login here

To continue enjoying Building.co.uk, sign up for free guest access

Existing subscriber? LOGIN

 

Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.

  • Limited access to building.co.uk
  • Breaking industry news as it happens
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

Get your free guest access  SIGN UP TODAY

Gated access promo

Subscribe now for unlimited access

 

Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:

  • Unlimited access to all stories including expert analysis and comment from industry leaders
  • Our league tables, cost models and economics data
  • Our online archive of over 10,000 articles
  • Building magazine digital editions
  • Building magazine print editions
  • Printed/digital supplements

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

View our subscription options and join our community