Architect follows Boris Johnson and blasts decision to ditch Estuary airport

Norman Foster has joined Boris Johnson in putting the boot in to the Airports Commission by claiming that its decision to kick out the firm’s plans for a new airport in the Thames Estuary will result in a “sadly predictable compromise”.

The firm was behind the proposals for the airport at the Isle of Grain which had been backed by the London mayor.

Earlier today, Johnson said the decision by the commission, which is chaired by Howard Davies, meant the commission was “irrelevant”.

Now Foster has accused it of short-termism and said that “the outcome of this process calls into question the validity of the commission”.

He added: “I predict that Londoners will be scathing in their condemnation of today’s announcement, when confronted with the inevitability of the blighting influence of Heathrow – the risks, noise and environmental impact of overflying London – and its inability to cope with predicted growth.

“They will ask why there was not even the courage to further explore – to study – to research a strategic long-term alternative to the instant gratification of a sadly predictable compromise.

“Adding a third runway at Heathrow is merely a short-term fix – it will inevitably lead to a fourth runway in order to maintain international hub status.”

 

Foster&Partners Thames Estuary

How the proposed Thames Estuary airport would look

 

Foster said the decision showed the UK was too timid to tackle the problem of airport capacity head on.

“Elsewhere in the world, relocating an airport that no longer serves its purpose is considered normal practice. France did it twice in a matter of decades. In Hong Kong we created a man-made island the size of Heathrow and built what was then the largest airport in the world – all in the space of six years.

“The pattern of the most competitive emerging economies is to replace the old and obsolescent and go boldly forward with the new, an opportunity today’s decision denies this country.”

Davies said the cost of building a new airport in the Thames Estuary was prohibitive but Foster said: “A new national airport in the Thames Estuary is a true design for the future, especially when linked into existing and new high speed train networks.

“It can be achieved more quickly and, based on independent analysis, there would not be a substantial cost difference between a fresh start at Thames Hub compared to a stop-gap solution at Heathrow.”

 

Foster&Partners Thames Estuary

The airport would have been served by new rail links