Views on the chief construction and scientific adviser role – and why it might be too much for one person

Paul Morrel Simon Tolson Andrew Mellor

Following our interview with the interim chief construction adviser, three experts - Paul Morrell, Andrew Mellor and Simon Tolson - consider the job advertised for a successor and who might be attracted to apply before next week’s deadline

Earlier this week, Building published its interview with Thouria Istephan, the interim chief construction adviser, about her journey from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry and her focus on competence as the thread running through reform of the built environment.

In that interview, she argued that the breadth of the role for her successor reflects the scale and complexity of the building safety challenge facing government, and stressed that the job advert should be read as describing the “office” rather than an all‑seeing individual.

As the government now seeks to appoint a permanent chief construction and scientific adviser, we have asked senior figures in the industry to share their initial views on the scope, structure and ambition of the newly created role - applications close next week (13 April).

This content is available to REGISTERED users

You are not currently logged in.

LOGIN or REGISTER to access this story

Gated access promo

LOGIN or REGISTER for free access on selected stories and sign up for email alerts.

Take out a print and online or online only subscription and you will get immediate access to:

  • Breaking industry news as it happens
  • Expert analysis and comment from industry leaders
  • Unlimited access to all stories, including premium content
  • Full access to all our online archive

Get access to premium content subscribe today