The unlikely return of the back-to-back: how the viability crunch is leading to experimentation with older forms

back to back 2

As housing numbers crash, developers are seeking ways to reimagine projects, with a range of new – and old – forms being tried to move projects forward

Housing starts in London collapsed to just 4,170 in the year to April, according to government data, the lowest figure on record and just a quarter of the average for the last five years. Starts across the country are also sharply down. While some northern markets remain strong, it is no exaggeration to say that much of the residential development industry is in something of a crisis.

Increasing regulatory requirements, compounded by soaring materials costs, mean that in parts of the country the homes developers have traditionally produced now simply cost more to build than buyers are willing to pay.

The problem is particularly acute for sites purchased several years ago before costs rose, with one in six London sites now on hold, according to data from Molior last autumn.

Andrew Matthews, co-founder of housing architect Proctor & Matthews Architects, says his practice’s situation is shared by others in the industry “We have got projects, but they’re all on hold,” he says. “If you look at our order book, it looks very healthy, but actually most of those projects are waiting for instruction.”

With build prices set to rise further in the wake of the Iran war, the problem is only going to worsen.

In the face of this, much of the industry focus to date has been on persuading the government to cut regulations or bring back support for first-time buyers.

Meanwhile some clients and designers are not passively waiting for government to ride to the rescue, but instead trying to tackle the crisis with a more radical reassessment of what they’re building. Designers are experimenting with forms, such as terraced back-to-back housing, that haven’t been used at scale in this country for many years, in order to make high-quality, high-density homes deliverable.

Doing so means moving away from the suburban houses and high-rise flats that have predominated in recent decades, and slaying some holy cows beloved by planners, funders and developers alike. So, what options are being looked at, and how do they change the viability equation?

Already registered? Login here

To continue enjoying Building.co.uk, sign up for free guest access

Existing subscriber? LOGIN

 

Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.

  • Limited access to building.co.uk
  • Breaking industry news as it happens
  • Breaking, daily and weekly e-newsletters

Get your free guest access  SIGN UP TODAY

Gated access promo

Subscribe now for unlimited access

 

Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:

  • Unlimited access to all stories including expert analysis and comment from industry leaders
  • Our league tables, cost models and economics data
  • Our online archive of over 10,000 articles
  • Building magazine digital editions
  • Building magazine print editions
  • Printed/digital supplements

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

View our subscription options and join our community