facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Feedback

Tuesday07 February 2012

Passivhaus diaries, part four: Reducing thermal bridging

  • Email
  • Comments (7)
  • Save

We cannot live in pure insulated boxes without windows and doors; nor can we ignore the fact of gravity. So, thermal bridges in buildings are inevitable. As standards for thermal performance become increasingly stringent, particularly at Passivhaus levels of performance, understanding and accurately modelling thermal bridging is becoming absolutely critical to accurately predicting the heat loss of a building. The current UK methodology - the Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) - uses, in my opinion, a crude generalised assessment of thermal bridging, given as the “y” value.

Conversely, the Passivhaus planning package (PHPP) requires far more detail, including the entry of a linear thermal bridge heat loss coefficient (the PSI value) for every junction. Although this approach can be more laborious, it ensures a far more accurate prediction of building heat loss than with the normal SAP-based approach.

Passivhaus walls and foundations at Denby Dale

At Denby Dale we are using a combination of details to minimise thermal bridging within the foundations and floor, illustrated in the sections we supplied with the last blog. The cavity wall goes right the way down to the foundation strip, which inevitably results in a thermal bridge where heat is transferred from the solid concrete groundfloor slab through the internal leaf of the cavity wall into the ground and strip foundations below. To minimise the effect of this we are undertaking two key measures.

Below the slab level we are using a lightweight aerated 7N/mm² block, which doesn't transfer heat as readily as the standard concrete block.

Unlike typical foundation wall details, we are also ensuring that the 300mm insulation in the cavity goes right down to the strip foundation, so that any heat lost from the concrete floor slab will have a lot further to go.

Thresholds

Doorways and windows are inevitably going to be weaker spots in terms of thermal bridging. Walls in the Denby Dale House have a U value of 0.1 W/m²K and windows and doors are 0.8 W/m²K. It is important therefore that we pay particular attention to where the windows and doors are placed within the walls - in this case the threshold on the floor slab. We've decided, for the sake of adequate support for the sunspace windows and entrance doors, to take the floor slab through the cavity for a further 150mm to be able to hold a substantial Passivhaus-style door or window. We felt that it was worth sacrificing some of the insulation in order to have the structural stability for the doors and sunspace windows. This has been worked through on PHPP and has been deemed within acceptable parameters. In response to the suggestion about an insulated threshold fitted into a rebate in the slab, this is definitely something that would be helpful here but we haven't been able to find a product suitable for this - any suggestions welcome or perhaps we need to invent it!

Passivhaus walls and foundations at Denby Dale

On site

Progress is relatively slow because some of the team are finishing off other jobs elsewhere. To be honest I'm not worried, as it means we can pay particular attention to the detailing - Jude, Andrew and Callum have been doing a wonderfully neat job. We're building the walls from foundation strip up to the floor level. We've taken delivery of wonderful looking polystyrene slabs (300mm thick). The polystyrene is being cut in as big as slabs as we can manage, so that the airflow in the cavity will be an absolute minimum.

At this point of the build, we need to take into consideration all the services coming into the building. To minimise thermal bridging and airtightness problems, we need to bring drains and services such as gas, water, electricity into the building in a careful manner. Our aim is to interrupt the thermal envelope as little as possible and to have services going into the building in positions which are easy to make airtight. To help minimise thermal bridging, we are bringing the drains in under the slab, rather than having exposed soil vent pipes outside coming through the wall. The gas and electric supply will have to come through the cavity into meter boxes, but they will be in such a position that we can maximise airtightness by using grommets bedded into the wet plaster.

Even the most minor aspect of the build has to be rethought in terms of airtightness and thermal bridging. For example, when bringing the drain into the bathroom, we want to make sure that it's far enough away from the wall to be able to see behind it so we can seal the joint. It would be difficult to seal around a 4 inch drainpipe that is right in the corner. This is where teamwork is vitally important in the build. Everyone within the construction team needs to understand what each subsequent trade is going to have to do, especially where airtightness and thermal bridging is concerned.

Related company resources

Readers' comments (7)

  • Bill Great diary. Interested to know how you are joining the slabs of insulation to avoid any gaps or movement leading to thermal bypass.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thank you Nick. The polystyrene is in 300mm thick slabs and the blockwork has been built carefully minimising the risks of thermal bypass. However, we will have two horizontal joints that needs attention. I was thinking of standard foam laid as beading back and front, but I need to check on the compatibility. Thermal bypass was going to be another blog subject, oh such excitement!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am still unsure why anyone would want a house that didn't breath. Or am I barking up the wrong tree?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thanks Bill, I know you are aware of it and will sort it!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Katie, The answer to your question is that low energy buildings need to be air tight to be able to control accurately fresh air ventilation. This is so as not to waste the heat generated within the building using a Mechanical Vent Heat Recovery (MVHR) system. In Europe this is known as "comfort ventilation". MVHR is absolutely fundamental to Passiv Haus design. If you can wait, we will be talking at length around this concept in future blogs. But could I say that a "breathing structure" can still be air tight!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Katie There is a lot of confusion about 'breathing buildings' even among architects. Part of the confusion is the way we use 'breathing' to refer to air (ventilation) and also moisture movement (eg breathable fabric). The bulk of moisture movement in any building is through the ventilation air whether through air leaks, windows or a more controlled way such as in this house. This is how moisture from people, cooking etc (and CO2, odour etc) is got rid of. However the structure is also breathable in the sense that any trapped moisture can escape as vapour. This can still happen in a totally airtight building. However this is just to protect the building not the occupants. Our skin is air and water tight and we breathe through our nose and mouth and sweat through our skin. I don't see anyone arguing that our skin should not be airtight.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Check out www.schoeck.co.uk. One of their products may be worth a look at regarding structural thermal barrier systems.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register
  • Email
  • Comments (7)
  • Save

Visit the forum

Sign in

Email Newsletters

I'm searching for in
Desktop Site | Mobile Site