- News
All the latest updates on building safety reformRegulations latest
- Focus
- Comment
- Programmes
- CPD
- Building the Future
- Jobs
- Data
- Subscribe
- Events
2024 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards
Keep up to date
- Building Boardroom
All the latest updates on building safety reform
2024 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards
Keep up to dateBy Lindy Patterson2021-06-22T05:00:00
Lindy Patterson explains a key principle of contract interpretation, based on a presumption against the use of surplus words
Much is written about the general principles of contract interpretation and to what extent the judgments in Wood vs Capita and Arnold vs Britton have changed or been finessed these over the past few years.
There are, however, certain linguistic “rules” or guidelines to interpretation which, although secondary, can provide a useful starting point in interpreting a provision or a set of words. One of these is the eiusdem generis principle.
Eiusdem generis means “of the same kind or nature” and this may be relied upon in contract interpretation where there is a list of specific items followed by a wider description (note: never the reverse order).
Read more …
Existing subscriber? LOGIN
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.
Get your free guest access SIGN UP TODAY
Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:
View our subscription options and join our community