facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Feedback

Thursday24 May 2012

Passivhaus diaries, part three: Dr Wolfgang Feist, the Passivhaus guru

  • Email
  • Comments (5)
  • Save

I am just back from an inspiring AECB conference. The AECB (Association for Environment Conscious Building - www.aecb.net), also known as the sustainable building association, is a membership association for all those engaged in sustainable building and incorporates everybody from architects and builders to enthusiastic self-builders.

Chris Herring, Steve Slator and I, the three Green Building Store directors, have been members of the AECB since its launch in 1989 and Chris is currently its national chair.

Tackling climate change is a top priority for the AECB and its CarbonLite programme promotes the Passivhaus approach to low energy building.

This year the AECB was honoured to have as its keynote speaker Professor Wolfgang Feist, founder of the Passivhaus Institut in Germany. Wolfgang, along with Swedish Professor Bo Adamson, pioneered and developed the Passivhaus design methodology basing their ideas on the robust application of building physics.

On the first night of the conference a group of us had a meal with Wolfgang and he expressed his interest in our efforts to build a Passivhaus in the British vernacular style using cavity wall construction and was very reassuring about its achievability. His keynote lecture was also encouraging and reassuring about the robustness of the Passivhaus methodology in general - and also answered the age-old question about the opening of windows in Passivhaus buildings.

People are always concerned about what happens when you open windows in a Passivhaus - Wolfgang was able to reassure us that it would have little impact on the ventilation system - as it would have a similar effect to opening windows in a standard house.

The conference was also a great opportunity to meet architects and specifiers interested in Passivhaus design. Our Denby Dale Passivhaus, the subject of these Passivhaus diaries, was flagged up in one of the lectures at the conference as one of five exemplar Passivhaus buildings currently underway in the UK.

The CarbonLite Programme promotes the uptake of Passivhaus design through continuing training courses on using the Passive House Design Package, The AECB has just completed its guidelines for a “gold standard”(like Passivhaus but with extra emphasis on energy efficiency of appliances lighting etc). We all came away feeling excited and encouraged about moving Passivhaus forward in the UK

On site

Excavation has gone very well and, thankfully, to budget and with no surprises. We've stripped the site, leveled it and a local farmer has taken the spoil to make use of it. We've excavated the trenches and have added the concrete, which is the same as any strip foundation apart from being wider because of the thickness of the walls - 225mm thick and 850mm wide. Kirklees Building Control have visited and approved depth of foundations.

This week we will be getting on with the footings and starting work on the blockwork substructure. After we've built the blockwork around, we will then put in hardcore (crushed stone) in 150mm compacted layers as normal. On top of the hardcore we'll be putting in sand blinding, insulation (225mm of Knauf polyfoam), damp proof membrane, followed by reinforced steel mesh and spacer blocks.

After that, we'll pour in the concrete (100mm) with a power-floated finish - ready to receive tiling or engineered timber flooring. There is nothing unusual about this - it is the simplest sort of floor you can have. The only Passivhaus detailing to this part of the build comes with the way we detail the concrete slab at the edge and the inner leaf blockwork specification.

The slab will be poured across the top of the blockwork inner leaf to minimize the subsequent shrinkage cracking between the wall and floor elements, an area that we identified as a major airtightness problem on the Longwood House we built in the early nineties. The blockwork below the slab will be built of lightweight insulated blocks such as 7N/mm² Celcon to help to minimize the only major thermal bridge in the build.

Hopefully the two sectional images of foundations below will help illustrate this. They show a typical section through the foundations. The second one demonstrates the added complication of an external door threshold.


Passivhaus 2

Passivhaus 1


Passivhaus 3


Related company resources

Readers' comments (5)

  • Prof Wolfgang Feist is an impressive speaker and is doing much to share his knowledge in Passivhaus construction. He stresses the need for more building physics to be thought in colleges and universities. He is also keen to have one standard for low energy building - in his case it should be the Passivhaus standard. This surely is the way to do it to aviod confusion. Its good to see the details - they help clarify quite a few things. I think there will be a cold bridge problem at the edge of the floor slab and treshold. Could this be avoided by having a insulated treshold fitted into a rebate in the concrete slab? I am enjoying reading about the progress. Keep up the good work.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Carney is right, there is a clear cold bridging between the floor and the wall. Why wasn't that eliminated?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This will always be one of the more difficult details in cavity wall construction. The apparent cold bridge is pretty much mitigated by the use of insulating blockwork. The psi values have been calculated for all details including this one and fed into PHPP and the house meets Passivhaus standard.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The 'cold bridge' has largely been eliminated by use of lightweight insulating block beneath the floor. This detail will always be a tricky one (perhaps the most tricky one) in cavity wall construction at this standard. However, the key point is having reduced the thermal bridge with insulating blockwork, the whole detail has been modelled and the resulting thermal bridging coefficient (psi value) fed into PHPP. So we know the effect of this detail on the performance of the building. How many buildings in the UK can one say that about?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Shouldn't respond when I am very tired! Also I am not repeating myself, but it appears there was a delay in putting up my first post, which I assumed lost. Yes there is a thermal bridge at the door threshold. It is the one detail we have never properly bottomed. The linear thermal bridging coefficient was modelled (a long time ago now) and is in PHPP, however, we have always known that it is the one detail we still needed to sort. This really does demonstrate how important it is to sort out all detailing before starting. Hopefully it is the only one left, and may turn out to be the one fudge. We are working on the best we can do, but are very open to suggestions, as the ideal threshold does not seem to exist.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register
  • Email
  • Comments (5)
  • Save

Visit the forum

Sign in

Email Newsletters

I'm searching for in
Desktop Site | Mobile Site