- News
All the latest updates on building safety reformRegulations latest
- Focus
- Comment
- Programmes
- CPD
- Building the Future
- Jobs
- Data
- Subscribe
- Events
2024 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards
Keep up to date
- Building Boardroom
All the latest updates on building safety reform
2024 events calendar
Explore nowBuilding Awards
Keep up to dateBy Alice Stacey-Jacobs and Aileen Brown 2022-02-28T05:00:00
Hirst vs Dunbar considered whether the Construction Act’s payment provisions affect the limitation period for payment claims
A recent Technology and Construction Court (TCC) decision appears to be first to consider whether the payment provisions of the Construction Act and Scheme for Construction Contracts affect the commencement of the limitation period for payment claims.
In the recent case of Hirst vs Dunbar [2022] EWHC 41, the TCC found that provisions specifying the due date for payment and the service of a payment notice by the paying party did not affect the general rule that a claim for payment accrues for limitation purposes upon completion of the work. Although the court only considered the provisions of the Scheme, similar reasoning might also be said to apply to some standard forms.
Read more …
Existing subscriber? LOGIN
Stay at the forefront of thought leadership with news and analysis from award-winning journalists. Enjoy company features, CEO interviews, architectural reviews, technical project know-how and the latest innovations.
Get your free guest access SIGN UP TODAY
Subscribe to Building today and you will benefit from:
View our subscription options and join our community